Epstein Secrets

formation by conceding that he in fact has the documents.” In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Dated April 18, 2003, 383 F.3d 905, 910 (9th Cir. 2004). The D.C. Circuit has recently refused to extend the act of production doctrine on facts very similar to those here. In United States v. Ponds, 454 F.3d 313 (D.C. Ci

@podhurst.com Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 485 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2010 Page 26 of 27 CASE NO:

18, 2003, 383 F.3d 905, 910 (9th Cir. 2004). The D.C. Circuit has recently refused to extend the act of product

Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz ah

ity is "at its most limited when reviewing the Executive's exercise of discretion over charging determinations." Id. In Fokker, the question before the D.C. Circuit was whether the district court had the power to decline to enter a speedy trial waiver because it believed that the terms of the DPA were too lenie

strict Judge Edward B. Davis, an esteemed jurist — was assigned the task of selecting and consulting with the Epstein-paid attorney-representative, Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq., to pursue claims on behalf of the victims against Mr. Epstein under 18 U.S.C. §2255. See Letter from FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman to Hon. Edward B.