Epstein Secrets

prosecutors included a promise to bind other districts. See United States v. Russo, 801 F.2d 624, 626 (2d Cir. 1986). She alleges that officials in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida sought and obtained approval for the NPA from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General and communicated with a

five enumerated offenses; (2) "any other offenses that have been the subject of the joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office"; and (3) "any offenses that arose from the Federal Grand Jury investigation." 6 EFTA00020266 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Documen

ware of its Brady obligations and that it has complied and will continue to comply with them. And because the witness statements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the G

prosecutors included a promise to bind other districts. See United States v. Russo, 801 F.2d 624, 626 (2d Cir. 1986). She alleges that officials in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida sought and obtained approval for the NPA from the Office of the Deputy Attorney General and communicated with a

five enumerated offenses; (2) "any other offenses that have been the subject of the joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office"; and (3) "any offenses that arose from the Federal Grand Jury investigation." 6 EFTA00022096 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Documen

ware of its Brady obligations and that it has complied and will continue to comply with them. And because the witness statements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the G

(S.D.N.Y. Jan. 6, 2010) (declining to order immediate disclosure of Giglio material, because the Government stated it would provide both Giglio and Jencks Act material "shortly before trial"); United States v. Davis, No. 06 Cr. 911 (LBS), 2009 WL 637164, at *14 (S.D.N.Y. March 11, 2009) ("The Second C

r disclosure obligation. Nor is the Government aware of any basis in law for this request. We note, in this respect, that neither the defendant nor the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is a party or signatory to the NPA, nor is the defendant or this Office named therein. As noted in the Govern

do not constitute Giglio or Jencks Act material. Request 14 — All Written and Oral Communications and Other Documents Concerning Meetings between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and Specified Attorneys for the Minor Victims and Other Witnesses: Your request does not articulate a basis i

for honesty, integrity, or competence. 12. Relating to any investigations, interviews, reports, analyses, or other documents provided by, or to, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the Department of Justice, the FBI, or any state or local government or regulatory body or agency, in connec

se us promptly whether the government will be producing Brady material immediately even if it is contained in what might otherwise be considered as Jencks material, or whether you take the position that you arc not obligated to produce such material at this time. EFTA00016145 --- PAGE BREAK --- Aug