Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
and the Jencks Act and that it will provide the required information to the defendants in accordance with its responsibilities under Giglio and the Jencks Act sufficiently in advance of each witness's testimony to allow adequate time to prepare for cross- examination. These representations are sufficie
.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Crornitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
and the Jencks Act and that it will provide the required information to the defendants in accordance with its responsibilities under Giglio and the Jencks Act sufficiently in advance of each witness's testimony to allow adequate time to prepare forcross- examination. These representations are sufficien
e.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. &ornate, et aL, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arid, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et aL, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No.
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
and the Jencks Act and that it will provide the required information to the defendants in accordance with its responsibilities under Giglio and the Jencks Act sufficiently in advance of each witness's testimony to allow adequate time to prepare for cross- examination. These representations are sufficie
e.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
and the Jencks Act and that it will provide the required information to the defendants in accordance with its responsibilities under Giglio and the Jencks Act sufficiently in advance of each witness's testimony to allow adequate time to prepare for cross- examination. These representations are sufficie
e.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et at, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. No
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
and the Jencks Act and that it will provide the required information to the defendants in accordance with its responsibilities under Giglio and the Jencks Act sufficiently in advance of each witness's testimony to allow adequate time to prepare for cross- examination. These representations are sufficie
e.g., United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM), Dkt. No. 25; United States v. Cromitie, et at, 09 Cr. 558 (CM), Dkt. No. 183, 200; United States v. Annabi, 10 Cr. 07 (CM), Dkt. No. 45; United States v. Arici, 12 Cr. 24 (LAP), Dkt. No. 115, 117; United States v. Reeves, et al., 16 Cr. 372 (VEC), Dkt. N
2 mentions
Page EFTA00020264
NPA did so. Applying Second Circuit precedent and principles of contract interpretation, the Court concludes that they did not. In United States v. Annabi, the Second Circuit held: "A plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless
Page: EFTA00020264 →Page EFTA00020289
ware of its Brady obligations and that it has complied and will continue to comply with them. And because the witness statements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the G
Page: EFTA00020289 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00022094
NPA did so. Applying Second Circuit precedent and principles of contract interpretation, the Court concludes that they did not. In United States v. Annabi, the Second Circuit held: "A plea agreement binds only the office of the United States Attorney for the district in which the plea is entered unless
Page: EFTA00022094 →Page EFTA00022119
ware of its Brady obligations and that it has complied and will continue to comply with them. And because the witness statements are covered by the Jencks Act, the Court cannot compel production of such statements under the terms of the statute. See 18 U.S.C. § 3500; Coppa, 267 F.3d at 145. Next, the G
Page: EFTA00022119 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (248)
Entities connected to both Jencks and Annabi
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON35 w/ Jencks·59 w/ Annabi
United States
LOCATION28 w/ Jencks·55 w/ Annabi
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON24 w/ Jencks·43 w/ Annabi
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Jencks·45 w/ Annabi
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON16 w/ Jencks·37 w/ Annabi
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Jencks·32 w/ Annabi
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ Jencks·42 w/ Annabi
FBI
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Jencks·36 w/ Annabi
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Jencks·31 w/ Annabi
Reid Weingarten
PERSON2 w/ Jencks·46 w/ Annabi
Brady
PERSON19 w/ Jencks·22 w/ Annabi
Prince Andrew
PERSON8 w/ Jencks·32 w/ Annabi
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON7 w/ Jencks·32 w/ Annabi
SA
Salameh
PERSON2 w/ Jencks·37 w/ Annabi
Giglio
PERSON14 w/ Jencks·25 w/ Annabi
Alexander Acosta
PERSON16 w/ Jencks·21 w/ Annabi
New York State
LOCATION6 w/ Jencks·31 w/ Annabi
BO
Bortnovsky
PERSON11 w/ Jencks·26 w/ Annabi
Michael Jackson
PERSON3 w/ Jencks·32 w/ Annabi
Anderson
PERSON2 w/ Jencks·32 w/ Annabi