Epstein Secrets

ed that, when defense counsel elected to put his investigator on the witness stand at trial, he must turn over the investigator's report pursuant to Jencks, but defense counsel can redact the report to only disclose that portion of the report that relates to the investigator's testimony. 7 EFTA006001

gned has not found any Eleventh Circuit cases that address this issue, the other Circuits that have addressed the issue have done so inconsistently. The First Circuit has held that a company may maintain even its attorney-client privilege and work-product privilege in materials that it discloses to the U.S. Attor

ed that, when defense counsel elected to put his investigator on the witness stand at trial, he must turn over the investigator's report pursuant to Jencks, but defense counsel can redact the report to only disclose that portion of the report that relates to the investigator's testimony. 7 EFTA006570

gned has not found any Eleventh Circuit cases that address this issue, the other Circuits that have addressed the issue have done so inconsistently. The First Circuit has held that a company may maintain even its attorney-client privilege and work-product privilege in materials that it discloses to the U.S. Attor

might aid in impeaching government witnesses at trial, "the legislative history expresses a much greater concern with limiting the application of the Jencks decision so that it would not hamper the workings of law enforcement by forcing wholesale disclosure of government materials and files." 33° The Jen

95-98 (3d Cir. 2006); United States v. Walker, 447 F.3d 999, 1006-07 (7th Cir. 2006); United States v. Egenberger, 424 F.3d 803, 805 (Sth Cir. 2005). The First Circuit has held only that the failure to provide notice does not constitute plain error. See United States v. Mateo, No. 06-1805, 2006 WL 1195676, at 1 (1st