Epstein Secrets

., Spaid, N., Bateman, J., and Jansen, B.J. (1997) Why Users Search the World Wide Web (WWW): The EXCITE Study, First Internet Librarian Conference, Monterey, CA. 16-18 November. Adams, W. J. and Jansen, B.J. (1997) Information Technology and the Classroom of the Future, Proceedings of the Society for I

76 EFTA00601652 Appendix B Testimony Cases Last Four Years Year Retained Deliverables Retained by Case 2016 Deposition Report Plaintiff Jane Doe v. Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.; BHP Billiton Petroleum (Deepwater) Ltd.; Schlumberger Technology Corporation; Aramark Services, In

nd Spain? 1 A. No. mope. 4 O. Carmen s A. Carmel? 6 MR. REINHART: California. Kathy? 7 MS. EZELL: Yes. A. No. we wouldn't have -- Was that Monterey 9 area? 10 MR. REINHART: Yes. 11 A. Yes. 12 O. Monterey you did. okay. 13 Do you remember a woman named Emmy • who would 14 accompany Ela

t Las OHS 130.40Velt1 5 Page S41[91650 ran Lo, ie. FL 31394 6 DIRECT EXAMINATION By Mr. Edwards #5 7 CROSS-EXAMINATION On betel d Planter Jane Doe 2 through s By Ms. Ezell *190 T mERUELSTE1N 6 HOROWITZ. PA 9 CROSS-EXAMINATION By Mr. Willits #195 10 BY: JESSICA D. ARBOUR. ATTORMEY.AT4AW.

ein's East 71st Street townhouse, which included some of the same guests.) In 2004, Mr. Brockman hosted a dinner at the Indian Summer restaurant in Monterey, Calif, where Mr. Epstein was introduced to scientists, including Seth Lloyd, the M.I.T. physicist. Mr. Lloyd said that he found Mr. Epstein to be

ms in the case, cited as Jane Does, say the necessary remedy is for Epstein to face what they say are long overdue charges in Florida. "To be sure, Jane Doe 1 and 2 very much appreciate the laudable efforts of the diligent prosecutors in New York," their lawyers wrote. "But those New York charges, importan

tein's East 71st Street townhouse, which included some of the same guests.) In 2004, Mr. Brockman hosted a dinner at the Indian Summer restaurant in Monterey, Calif., where Mr. Epstein was introduced to scientists, including Seth Lloyd, the M.I.T. physicist. Mr. Lloyd said that he found Mr. Epstein to be

fore-we-do-something-bad claim that deserves no credence from the Court," wrote Edwards and his co-counsel on behalf of the two women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. They also pointed out that the prosecutors weren't asserting the alleged "risk" to some victims outweighs obtaining justice for the

shers. Wortman, C.B. & Loftus, E.F. (1981). Psychology. New York: Random House (ICnopf). Loftus, G.R. & Loftus, E.F. (1982). Essence of Statistics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Bootzin, R., Loftus, E., & Zajonc, R. (1983). Psychology Today (5th ed.). NY: Random House. Loftus, G.R. & Loftus, E.F. (1983). M

Balancing with the players stacked against you. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 365-366 (Book Review). Loftus, E.F. & Guyer, M. (2002) Who Abused Jane Doe?: The Hazards of the Single Case History. Skeptical Inquirer. Part I. Vol 26, #3 (May/June), Pp. 24-32. Loftus, E. F. & Guyer, M. J. (2002) Who Abu

tein's East 71st Street townhouse, which included some of the same guests.) In 2004, Mr. Brockman hosted a dinner at the Indian Summer restaurant in Monterey, Calif., where Mr. Epstein was introduced to scientists, including Seth Lloyd, the M.I.T. physicist. Mr. Lloyd said that he found Mr. Epstein to be

fore-we-do-something-bad claim that deserves no credence from the Court," wrote Edwards and his co-counsel on behalf of the two women, identified as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2. They also pointed out that the prosecutors weren't asserting the alleged "risk" to some victims outweighs obtaining justice for the

delphia, Pennsylvania) Testified at trial, 8/25/00 CA v. Joseph Neale (Riverside, California) Testified at trial, 11/20/00 CA v. Rex Allan Krebs (Monterey, California) Testified at penalty phase, 05/03/01 Saunders v. City of Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa, California) Testified at deposition, 6/27/01 Testif

k, New York) [2nd Circuit Opinion: 938 F.2d 1535 (2nd Cir. 1991)] Testified at deposition, 5/13/90 Testified in court (trial or hearing), 5/14/90 Jane Doe v. Stuart Brown. M.D. (San Diego, California) Testified by deposition, 6/6/90 Carin Evans vs. Richard Benton, Ph.D. (Houston, Texas) Testified at

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 434 BY MS. EZELL: Q. Do you know whether Jeffrey Epstein attended the Edge Science dinner in Monterey, California? MR. REINHART: Objection to the form, lack o foundation. Instruct the witness not to answer. THE WITNESS: At the instruction of my law

frey Epstein, defendant. CMA, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, defendant. And Jane Doe, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, et al, defendant. And Jane Doe -- is there a shorter thing that we can do here? It's also missing this one right here. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Do we have a problem with saying Jane Do

ein's East 71st Street townhouse, which included some of the same guests.) In 2004, Mr. Brockman hosted a dinner at the Indian Summer restaurant in Monterey, Calif, where Mr. Epstein was introduced to scientists, including Seth Lloyd, the M.I.T. physicist. Mr. Lloyd said that he found Mr. Epstein to be

fore-we-do-something-bad claim that deserves no credence from the Court," wrote Edwards and his co-counsel on behalf of the two women, identified as Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2. They also pointed out that the prosecutors weren't asserting the alleged "risk" to some victims outweighs obtaining justice for

tein's East 71st Street townhouse, which included some of the same guests.) In 2004, Mr. Brockman hosted a dinner at the Indian Summer restaurant in Monterey, Calif, where Mr. Epstein was introduced to scientists, including Seth Lloyd, the M.I.T. physicist. Mr. Lloyd said that he found Mr. Epstein to be

ion 12 years later, after receiving arguments from lawyers for two of Epstein's victims, prosecutors and Epstein. The victims in the case, cited as Jane Does, say the necessary remedy is for Epstein to face what they say are long overdue charges in Florida. "To be sure, Jane Doe 1 and 2 very much appreci