4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
19). Though it has not authoritatively settled the question, the Second Circuit has strongly suggested that Maxwell's approach is the wrong one. In Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48, 58-60 (2d Cir. 2017), the Second Circuit discussed at length how the text, context, and history of § 3283 show that
Page: EFTA00020270 →eptance Co., LLC, Sec. Litig., 391 F.3d at 407. Applying it to conduct for which the statute of limitations has not yet expired does not. Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. Sch. Dist., 49 F.3d 886, 890 (2d Cir. 1995). Maxwell concedes that these offenses were within the statute of limitations when Congress enacted the
Page: EFTA00020276 →19). Though it has not authoritatively settled the question, the Second Circuit has strongly suggested that Maxwell's approach is the wrong one. In Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48, 58-60 (2d Cir. 2017), the Second Circuit discussed at length how the text, context, and history of § 3283 show that
Page: EFTA00022100 →eptance Co., LLC, Sec. Litig., 391 F.3d at 407. Applying it to conduct for which the statute of limitations has not yet expired does not. Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. Sch. Dist., 49 F.3d 886, 890 (2d Cir. 1995). Maxwell concedes that these offenses were within the statute of limitations when Congress enacted the
Page: EFTA00022106 →WL 2351484 (D. Conn. June 7, 2010) 5 United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA) (HKS), 2014 WL 1838255 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) 15 Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. School Dist., 49 F.3d 886 (2d Cir. 1995) 9 iii EFTA00028906 --- PAGE BREAK --- Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2017) 5, 6,
Page: EFTA00028906 →5 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) 15 Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. School Dist., 49 F.3d 886 (2d Cir. 1995) 9 iii EFTA00028906 --- PAGE BREAK --- Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2017) 5, 6, 7, 13 Statutes 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a) 2, 13, 14, 15 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 2, 13, 14, 15 18 U.S.
Page: EFTA00028907 →19). Though it has not authoritatively settled the question, the Second Circuit has strongly suggested that Maxwell's approach is the wrong one. In Weingarten v. United States, 865 F.3d 48, 58-60 (2d Cir. 2017), the Second Circuit discussed at length how the text, context, and history of § 3283 show that
Page: EFTA00029549 →eptance Co., LLC, Sec. Litig., 391 F.3d at 407. Applying it to conduct for which the statute of limitations has not yet expired does not. Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent. Sch. Dist., 49 F.3d 886, 890 (2d Cir. 1995). Maxwell concedes that these offenses were within the statute of limitations when Congress enacted the
Page: EFTA00029555 →Entities connected to both Reid Weingarten and Cassadaga Valley Cent.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATIONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONAnnabi
PERSON
Eric Holder
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATIONCollins
PERSONWerner
PERSONSalameh
PERSONSchneider
PERSONThompson
PERSONTracy
PERSON
Leahy
PERSON
Brady
PERSONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Bridges
PERSON
Hernandez
PERSON