Epstein Secrets

18/04, which is consistent with her recollection of the time frame. L. JANE DOE #41plalla Jane Doe # 7 attended High School. She was recruited by Tatum to go to Epstein's house when she was 16 years' old. Tatum also went to Epstein's house and performed sexual services starting when she was 15. Tat

the overt acts and substantive allegations related to each Jane Doe because the indictment has been revised to group the overt acts related to each Jane Doe. 'Each of the airplanes is held in a separate "shell corporation," JEGE, Inc., and Hyperion Air, Inc. Epstein is the sole shareholder in both of th

led the "Declaration of /Mt' attaching the state detective's affidavit in support of a search warrant for Epstein's house. See : hay Subpoenas Awes Tatum OLY-63 and OLY.64, No. Fat 07.103(WPB) (S.D. Fla. July 31, 2007). At the time she filed affidavit, she knew it contained numerous material misrepr

the formcr firm of Herman, Sloman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled "Jane Doe # vs. 'effigy Epstein" despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Federa

of 20 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 21. 22 taken on behalf of the Plainbffs pursuant 23 to a Re-Notice of Taking Continued Videotaped 24 Depo9tlon (Duals Tatum) 25 - - - Page 2/3 Page 272 1 JANE DOE NO. Ii, CASE NO: 08-CV.80469 2 Plaintiff, 3 Vs. 4 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 5 Defendant. 6 JANE DOE NO

7, CASE NO: 08-CV-80993 Plaintiff, vs. 9 JEFFREY EPSIEIN, 10 11 12 C.N.A., 13 Plaintiff, 14 Vs. 15 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 16 Defendant. 17 JANE DOE, CASE NO: 08.07-80893 18 Plaintiff, 19 Vs. 20 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 Defendant. CASE NO: 08.CV-80811 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 1 IN THE C

an ancient action, malicious prosecution. But it is that very case that answers a point that Your Honor was just discussing. I'm talking about the Tatum Brothers case. And it says in Tatum Brothers -- THE COURT: Do you have a tab number for me? MS. ROCKENBACH: The tab number is -- I don't know th

st line. "RRA and the attorneys in the civil actions" -- Please remember, the civil action is a defined term in the complaint. It's L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe's claims -- "needed to create a fiction that included extraordinary damages. However, the actual facts behind her action would never support such e

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) A Mr. Epstein paid Jane Doe Number Eight two or $300. She could not recall exactly. Tatum was also paid $200 for bringing Jane Doe Number Eight, and Tatum also told Jane Doe Number Eight that if she brought someone she would be paid $2

to locate and interview more girls? 12 A Yes. 13 Q Let's turn to the specific evidence reporting 14 the overt acts and offenses relating to Jane Doe's 1 15 through 5. I know that every member of the grand jury has 16 17 a copy of the draft indictment before them, and also a chart. 18 Do you

, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 05995 04/01/2009 Bradley Edwards Carolyn Edwards Third party subpoenas for Tatum/Courtney Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence;

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in Jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

in's residence prior to Rivera's first contact with him. During one of their conversations, Epstein asked Rivera, "Do you know that girl Jenny that Tatum brought?" At the conclusion of the interview, Rivera directed the interviewing agents to Virginia LNU's residence, 2319 Avenue Barcelona Este, loca

ney General or any office under his direction.'" Id. at *2 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(6)). For these reasons, the Court should deny the motion of Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 to discover and use the plea negotiation letters as evidence. PART II MR. EPSTEIN'S PLEA NEGOTIATIONS ARE PRIVILEGED AND NOT DISCO

were obtained from message notes via trash pulls, I identified the before mentioned individuals as being acquainted with someone at 358 El Brillo. Tatum, DOB 06/07/1984, FL DL 41350115847070 and Harrison, DOB 06/12/1986 FL DL3h625432867120 are both above the legal age of consent. On 05/0g3/2005, I

e informed the USAO and the FBI that she was not a victim of any offense committed by Epstein, and, as a result, the USAO did not consider informing Jane Doe #2 about the non-prosecution agreement. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. 2(e). 3. Denied. 4. Denied. 5. The

Operation Leap Year? A Yes, I am. Q Did you recently participate in an interview of A Yes. • Can you tell us s date of birth? A A Q A Tatum was born on July 26, 1988. And you spoke with her recently? Yes, we did. So she was 18 at the time of the interview? Yes, I believe she was. Who

locate and interview 11 more girls? 12 A Yes. 13 Q Let's turn to the specific evidence reporting 14 the overt acts and offenses relating to Jane Doe's 1 15 through 5. I know that every member of the grand jury has 16 a copy of the draft indictment before them, and also a 17 chart. 18 Do you

to trial. She was just 15 years old when she was drawn into Epstein’s exploitative world in 1998. In her civil writ against him, under the pseudonym Jane Doe 102’ she alleged that her duties included being ‘sexually exploited by Epstein’s adult male peers including royalty’. Now, horrified by the evidence

ty calls ‘Granny's Chips’ and the solitaire seed that grow @ into a flower: Queen's brooches and earrings have a glittering history Sporty! Channing Tatum wears a backward baseball cap and matching vest as he leaves NYC hotel The Magic Mike star was hard to miss Rollin’ and strollin'! Chilled Bobby Can