Epstein Secrets

usiness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. See In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641- 643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the document(s) were fil

CM/ECF on thislZ day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, By I.Jlf,tE ROBERT '.cR.rfTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/84

siness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. ,ate In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641- 643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the document(s) were fil

ied by CM/ECF on this 141 day of April, 2010. Respectfully submitted, Br ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, a 33401 561/842

further appears to argue that the “required records” exception should be limited to “highly regulated business (e.g., physicians)”, citing In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). In Dr. John Doe, however, the Court held contrary to Defendant’s assertion and consistent with the case l

Isidro Manuel Garcia [email protected] Jack Patrick Hill [email protected] Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell [email protected] Richard Horace Willits [email protected] Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefs

d 1188, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and Doherty v. John Doe No. 22, 957 So.2d 1267 (4th DCA 2007). A reading

eems just and proper. By:__.:=. ___ _.::,.. __ MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Servic

siness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. See In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the Case 9:08-cv-80119

rvice List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 14th day of March, 2010. By: ~~ ROBE , JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 488 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/15/2010 Page 11 of 12 Page No. 11 [email protected]

ed business (e.g., physicians)”, citing In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). In Dr.

Katherine Warthen Ezell [email protected] Michael James Pike [email protected] Paul G. Cassell cassell

thin the bounds of reasonableness, 11 the Defendant is entitled to the information 12 contained in Interrogatory 19. 13 Now, with regard to the John Doe issue 14 relative to partners or Jane Doe, whoever may be 15 involved, I will permit, as did Judge Lewis in 16 her analysis, anyone who is name

Fort Lauderdale FL 33394 11 12 13 On behalf of the Defendant: 14 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN BY: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. 15 and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive 16 Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 EFTA00776367 3 1 Proceedings in the

it, 21 so I could only assume that. And then when I spoke to 22 Jessica, she only explained that because it just said 23 Jane Doe No. 4 versus John Doe or something like that. 24 So, so, she just explained that they were representing 25 the Defendant and they wanted the deposition. Page 36 1 M

rough 8: JESSICA ARBOUR, ESQUIRE MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ... • 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 • Miami, l ' Phone: E-mail: On behalf 9 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQUIRE BURMAN, CRTTTON, LUMER & COLEMAN, UP 10 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 11 Wed Palm Florida 33401 INDEX VOLUME I 12 13 14 15 16

ichard C. W. Hall, M.D., P.A. Taxpayer ID #: Drs. Hall's time: Jane Doe #2 Records reviewed: Correspondence of Gilbert Kliman, MD Transcript of John Doe #2 v. Rabbi Ychuda Kolko et al Palm Beach Police Department Probable Cause Affidavit Billing records of Gilbert Kliman, MD 08/07/09 Review, annot

Page 1 of 2 Connie Zaguirre, CP, FRP From: Michael J. Pike Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 3:23 PM To: Connie Zaguirre, CP, FRP. Subject: FW: Billing info Attachments: epstein2.inv.doc; epsteln3.inv.d

dnote 2 for full text of §39.204, Fla. Stat.2 (¶'s Motion, p. 8-9). See Carson v. Jackson, 466 So.2d 1188, 1192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); and Doherty v. John Doe No. 22, 957 So.2d 1267 (4th DCA 2007). A reading of these cases establishes that §39.204 does not provide Plaintiff with a carte blanche access to D

691 jaaescabellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respe By: ROB R D. C ITTON , ESQ. Florida Bar No. 22416 rcrit(bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpikeebcIclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-84