Epstein Secrets

siness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. ,ate In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641- 643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the document(s) were fil

ry, Ins., 2008 WL 3895918 (S.D. Ha. 2009)(unless liability for punitive damages is established at trial, the discovery sought is not relevant). In Gallina, the court held that in light of the proprietary of the financial worth information sought, and the statutory protections against discovery of such

further appears to argue that the “required records” exception should be limited to “highly regulated business (e.g., physicians)”, citing In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). In Dr. John Doe, however, the Court held contrary to Defendant’s assertion and consistent with the case l

m of money which, according to his financial ability, will hurt, but not 3 Defendant’s reliance on Gallina v. Commerce and Industry Ins., 2008 WL 3895918 (M.D. Fla. 2008) is misplaced. Gallina is an insurance bad faith case and does not involve a claim o

usiness (e.g., physicians) wherein the records themselves have assumed public aspects which render them analogous to public documents. See In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641- 643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). Usually, these documents are known to more than the filer and the agency in which the document(s) were fil

ent 545 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/12/2010 Page 26 of 37 Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 26 also Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(l) and Fla. Stat. 768.72; Gallina v. Commerce And Industry, Ins., 2008 WL 3895918 (S.D. Fla. 2009)(unless liability for punitive damages is established at trial, the discovery sough

ed business (e.g., physicians)”, citing In re Dr. John Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). In Dr.

3 Defendant’s reliance on Gallina v. Commerce and Industry Ins., 2008 WL 3895918 (M