Epstein Secrets

X' Om Ile. Onlyl I mins med from I Original ] 2 Rernoved from 3 3 Rc-filed. O 4 Reinumed or O s &norner diunci D 6 Muludisirim Procest ing State Court (set VI klov) Re gened Ispecifyl Lifiginion VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). a) Rc- filed Case n YES l3 NO b) Related Cases 7 YES 3 NO ISee Hur

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00177302 Case 9:08-cv-; i-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/. )8 Page 4 of 21 had been tried federally and

y Edwards' other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

ment available to the victims, the United States sought to confirm that counsel for Mr. Epstein had filed the complete Agreement under seal with the State Court at the time of the entry of his guilty plea to the State charges, to insure that an exact copy of that Agreement would be provided in this case, sh

would have had, if Mr. Epstein 'The undersigned does not know when Mr. Edwards began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation. -3- EFTA00184199 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 4 of 21 had been tried federally an

y Edwards' other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein, the target of the investigation.' 5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office

ein was taking I consistent position with the State Attorney's Office, Judge McSorley, and the USAO, so I asked for I copy of what was filed in the State Court. This led to multiple letters with counsel for Epstein before I could finalize the victim notification letters (Exhibits B-57 through B-65). On July

her in touch with his attorney, Jack Goldberger; and Goldberger had his friend, Jim Eisenberg, serve as Individual #28's lawyer while Epstein paid Eisenberg's fees. Individual #28 later told Brad Edwards that someone (Epstein, Goldberger, or Eisenberg) told her that "the government" planned to take away

t several of the young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to

any information that I wanted considered by the United States Attorney's Office. Villafafia told me that she believed Jane Doe 2 was represented by James Eisenberg and I told her that I understood she had been in the past but no longer was and that I was led to believe she now wanted to cooperate. At the time o

rties to this litigation Box #2 P-008299 Thru P-008363 File folder entitled "FINAL AGREEMENTS" containing subfolder entitled "Agrints Filed in State Court" (P-008300-P-008327 [not being withheld as privileged — have been produced to opposing counsel]); signed Non-Prosecution Agreement, Addendum, and

rvice of the subpoena, Ms.= retained the services of James Eisenberg, Esq. to represent her. Jeffrey Epstein paid for that representation. 3. Mr. Eisenberg communicated to me orally and in writing that Ms. would assert her Fifth Amendment privilege if she were forced to appear before the grand jury, an

arties to this litigation Box #2 P-008299 Thru P-008363 File folder entitled "FINAL AGREEMENTS" containing subfolder entitled "Agrmts Filed in State Court" (P-008300-P-008327 [not being withheld as privileged — have been produced to opposing counsel]); signed Non-Prosecution Agreement, Addendum, and

imile: February 5, 2007 DELIVERY BY HAND James L. Eisenberg, Esq. 250 S Australian Ave, Ste 704 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5007 Re: n Dear Mr. Eisenberg: I am writing to clarify the ground rules for the interview with your client ("your client"), to occur February , 2007. As I mentioned earlier, M

30, #32, and #38 7/21/2008 Villafaiia; cc: Senior Sloman Email response to Vilkfaiia's 7/21/08 email regarding Motion for Return of Property in State Court 7/22/2008 Villafaiia K tz% rkcndall Email chain regarding victim addresses 7/22/2008 Emails between A. M. Vitiate's, A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. S

Menchel with attached letter containing counter- proposal for plea to two years of 'supenised custody.' 9 8/24/2006- 10/24/2006 Entails betweenJim Eisenberg and Marie Villafana regarding #28 10 10/30/2006- 10/31-2006 Emails between Marie Vitt:liana and Guy Lewis regarding Lewis respresentation of Eps

ein was taking a consistent position with the State Attorney's Office, Judge McSorley, and the USAO, so I asked for a copy of what was filed in the State Court. This led to multiple letters with counsel for Epstein before I could finalize the victim notification letters (Exhibits B-57 through B-65). On July

contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe I United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for by Mr. Epstein. I told Mr. Eisenberg that I was preparing victim notification letters and needed to know if he was still representing