7808 Vi. ORIGIN x1. Original 0 2. Removed from 03.Remanded from 4. Refilled 6. Multidistrict Litigation O7. Appeal to District Judge from Proceeding State Court Appellate Court 01 5. Transferred from another district (Specify) Magistrate Judgment GLARENGE MAB Vil. REQUESTED CHECK IF THIS IS A O CLASS ACTION

MOTION TO STAY [DE 12] In connection with his motion to stay this action [DE 12], Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court that the State Court action, State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), was resolved on June 30, 2

United States Code. 3. Subsequent to filing his Motion for Stay on July 1, 2008, Defendant Epstein filed a Notice advising this Court that the State Court criminal action against the Defendant was resolved, but that the federal criminal proceeding remained pending. It is Plaintiff’s counsel’s understa

has not heard back from either of the attorneys. Additionally, the undersigned discussed the foregoing with counsel for Jane Doe this morning at a State Court hearing in Palm Beach County, Florida. Rule 7.1 Certification I hereby certify that counsel for the respective parties communicated by letters (e

y scheduled for November I 0, 2009. 4. The parties have reached an agreement related to Jane Doe's Independent Medical Examination subject to the State Court Order attached hereto as Exhibit A. 5. Therefore, Plaintiff, Jane Doe's, Motion for Order Permitting Legal Counsel to Attend Independent Medical E

n February 3, 2010, counsel for Plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a Notice of Taking the Deposition of Third-Party Witness, NADIA MARCINKOV A, in a related State Court action filed against Mr. Epstein. While the Notice is filed in L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Circuit Court Case No: 502008CA028051AXXX

ed cases before this Court and three (3) cases in State Court, as well as a newly filed case before Judge Gold

t several of the young girls that were victimized and abused by Jeffrey Epstein. While we are aware of his recent guilty plea and conviction in his State Court case, the sentence imposed in that case is grossly inadequate for a sexual predator of this magnitude. The information and evidence that has come to