DOJ-COURT-018 is a legal document from the Southern District of Florida concerning the case of Jane Doe No. 2 versus Jeffrey Epstein.
The document is a motion filed by the plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, requesting an enlargement of time to respond to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for a stay in the case. The motion for a stay was based on purported parallel criminal actions against Epstein, but the plaintiff argues that the federal criminal proceeding may be resolved in the same plea deal as the State Court action, potentially making the motion for a stay moot. The plaintiff requests twenty additional days to file a memorandum in opposition to Epstein's motion.

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
- 1 - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR STAY Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant’s Motion for Stay, and states as follows: 1. Defendant filed his Motion for Stay on June 20, 2008. Plaintiff’s response is due on or before July 10, 2008. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Stay is based upon the existence of purported parallel criminal actions, and is grounded in section 3509(k) of Title 18, United States Code. 3. Subsequent to filing his Motion for Stay on July 1, 2008, Defendant Epstein filed a Notice advising this Court that the State Court criminal action against the Defendant was resolved, but that the federal criminal proceeding remained pending. It is Plaintiff’s counsel’s understanding from press reports, however, that the federal criminal proceeding will be resolved in the same plea deal, which would make the Defendant’s Motion for Stay moot.1 4. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests a brief enlargement of time of twenty (20 1 Plaintiff opposes the Motion for Stay on its merits under 18 U.S.C. §3509(k). Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008
Page 1 of 4 - 2 - days) within which to file a memorandum in opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Stay. This request for enlargement of time is in the interest of judicial economy and efficiency. 5. Additionally, Plaintiff’s counsel requests this enlargement of time due to the demands on their time in other cases and matters. 6. Prior to filing this Motion, Plaintiff’s counsel, Adam Horowitz, attempted to confer with defense counsel, to no avail. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully request that this Court enter an order enlarging by twenty (20) days the time within which the Plaintiff may respond to the Defendant’s Motion for Stay, until July 30, 2008. Dated: July 10, 2008. Respectfully submitted, By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz . Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008
Page 2 of 4 - 3 - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 10, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ Adam D. Horowitz . Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008
Page 3 of 4 - 4 - SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger [email protected] Michael R. Tein [email protected] /s/ Adam D. Horowitz Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/10/2008

