Epstein Secrets

aw or factual matters which it believes the court overlooked and that might reasonably be expected to alter the court's decision." United States v. Berger, 188 F. Supp. 2d 307, 328-39 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). But "[t]he standard for granting a motion for reconsideration `is strict.' Fanner v. United States, N

." United States v. Berger, 188 F. Supp. 2d 307, 328-39 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). But "[t]he standard for granting a motion for reconsideration `is strict.' Fanner v. United States, No. 12-CR-758/15-cv-6287 (MN), 2017 WL 3448014, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2017) (quoting Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partner

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00206624 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

KNIGHT: Just to go a little further on 17 and, therefore, the trustee, rather than 17 what Mr. NoiwIrth was saying. Out of these documents 18 Mr. Fanner and his client, because as to them the 18 we've been asking for for a long time, very few of 19 case is over. 19 them would even have privilege on

ts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. 72 23 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 25 25 Singcrman on behalf of the trustee dist they had °UM-LEITH & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, (305) 3584875 EFTA00213917 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM

KNIGHT: Just to go a little further on 17 and, therefore, the trustee, rather than 17 what Mr. NoiwIrth was saying. Out of these documents 18 Mr. Fanner and his client, because as to them the 18 we've been asking for for a long time, very few of 19 case is over. 19 them would even have privilege on

rts against 21 22 the trustee. That left us in a quandary. n 23 We had a subpoena pending in State 73 24 24 Court. We had correspondence from Berger 75 25 Singerman on behalf of the trustee dist they had OUELLETTE & MAULDIN COURT REPORTERS, EFTA00235301 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 214-3

e equation, the other part is — 22 THE COURT: No, no, no, I can appoint a 23 special master. 24 MR. LICHTM.AN: Yes. 25 THE COURT: All right Mr. Fanner. ►ate 36 I special master and you'll have an opportunity to be 2 heard before me before I authorize the release of the 3 information, because