ustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument

ility of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Fanner, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law. 2. Prior to

. Copies of all documentation related to all settlements, attorneys' fees awards, jury verdict awards, and arbitration/mediation income received by Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., and/or Bradley J. Edwards, PA. 5. Income tax records for the current tax year, and copies of an

any estimated income tax returns filed for the current year for Edwards. 3. Copies of income tax returns for the past three (3) calendar years of Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 4. Copies of all documentation related to all settlements, attorneys' fees awards, jury verdict

ility of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Fanner, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law. 2. Prior to

ustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument

ustee Pursuant to Document Production Protocol, as established by D.E. #672 (D.B. #807); (ii) Motion for Protective Order filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos and Lefunzan, P.L. ("Painter, Jaffe") (D.E. #81 8) and its related amendment (D.E. #819). The Court heard argument

ility of the attorney/client and work product privileges that may inure to the benefit of L.M., Brad Edwards, and other current or former clients of Fanner, Jaffe; (ii) segregate any such privileged documents; and (iii) prepare a privilege log in accordance with standard practice and law. 2. Prior to

KNIGHT: Just to go a little further on 17 and, therefore, the trustee, rather than 17 what Mr. NoiwIrth was saying. Out of these documents 18 Mr. Fanner and his client, because as to them the 18 we've been asking for for a long time, very few of 19 case is over. 19 them would even have privilege on

e equation, the other part is — 22 THE COURT: No, no, no, I can appoint a 23 special master. 24 MR. LICHTM.AN: Yes. 25 THE COURT: All right Mr. Fanner. ►ate 36 I special master and you'll have an opportunity to be 2 heard before me before I authorize the release of the 3 information, because

f the Protocol. See Co-Executors' Corrections to Attorney General's Status Report on Voluntary Compensation Program and Renewed Request for Ruling, Fanner v. Indyke, No. 19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF, Dkt. 73-1. 1. Specificity The Protocol establishes a process that all claimants must follow. The "Claimant" mus

I and 2 United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe #

agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on your behalf about the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment: I Place: Fanner, Jaffe. Weissing, et al. I Date and Time: 425 North Andrews Avenue. Suite 2 i 07708/2010 2;00 pm Lauderdaigh.a13201 The deposition will be reco

oes 1 and 2i United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. E-mail: [email protected] Paul G. Cassell (801) 585-5202 Fax: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: cas

KNIGHT: Just to go a little further on 17 and, therefore, the trustee, rather than 17 what Mr. NoiwIrth was saying. Out of these documents 18 Mr. Fanner and his client, because as to them the 18 we've been asking for for a long time, very few of 19 case is over. 19 them would even have privilege on

the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 2nd day of September, 2010. Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 423 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954.524-2822 Fax BradQpat

New York, alleging that she and her 15-year-old sister, Annie, had been sexually assaulted by Epstein and Maxwell in separate locations in 1996. Fanner met Epstein and Maxwell at her graduate art gallery reception at the New York Academy of Art in 1995. The following year, in the summer of 1996, th

t5 day of March, 2010: Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Brad Edwards, Esq. Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ounse or ant in e a e ase No. 084089-3 Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice EFTA00207708 Case

] to New Mexico" and was "inappropriate" with her. Id. She was reluctant to go into details about her experience with Mr. Epstein. Id. at 73. Ms. Fanner opposes Mr. Epstein's pretrial release because she believes other Epstein victims would "continu[e] to be victimized" and that Mr. Epstein's wealt

s in 1996. Farmer's affidavit was filed in support of a defamation suit by Virginia Giuffre against Alan Dershowit25§-91 According to the affidavit, Fanner had met Maxwell and Epstein at a New York art gallery reception in 1995. The affidavit says that in the summer of the following year, they hired he

n New York, alleging that she and her 15-year-old sister, Annie, had been sexually assaulted by Epstein and Maxwell in separate locations in 1996. Fanner met Epstein and Maxwell at her graduate art gallery reception at the New York Academy of Art in 1995. The following year, in the summer of 1996, th

l court in New York, alleging that she and her 35-year-old sister, Annie, had been assaulted Epstein and Maxwell in separate locations in 1996. Fanner met Epstein and Maxwell at her graduate art gallery reception at the New York Academy of Art in 1995. The following year, in the summer of 1996, th

ear, in the summer of 1996, they hired her to work on an art project in. Leslie Weimer's Ohio mansion, where she was then seawall assaulted (}6 41 Fanner reported the incident to the New 'lark City Police Department d. I. an the FB 16 Farmer's affidavit also stated that during the same summer, Epstei

confinement, to ensure inmates receive adequate food, clothing shelter and medical care, and to take reasonable measures to guarantee their safety (Fanner v. Brennan 511 US 825 (1994). Only those deprivations denying the minimal civilized measure of life's necessities are sufficiently grave to form th