Back to People & Entities
D. Conn.
Location
12
Total Mentions
12
Documents
97
Connected Entities
The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (D. Conn.) appears in 12 documents related to legal citations and proceedings, with connections to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, the Second Circuit, Alison J. Nathan, and the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
D. Conn. is referenced in legal citations within court filings and legal documents, specifically in cases such as *United States v. Stroh*, *United States v. Ferguson*, and *United States v. Calderon*. These citations relate to discussions on extradition requests, modification of protective orders, and the statute of limitations for sex trafficking charges. These mentions appear to be part of standard legal referencing, indicating the court's involvement in cases with similar legal questions, but not necessarily a direct connection to the actions of Epstein or Maxwell.
Key Highlights
- •D. Conn. appears in 12 documents, primarily in legal citations.
- •The citations relate to various legal topics, including extradition, protective orders, and sex trafficking charges.
- •The connection to Epstein and Maxwell is through legal proceedings where D. Conn. rulings or procedures are referenced.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Links
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (12)
1 mention
extradition request is pending in Canada and may be subject to withdrawal."); United States v. Stroh, No. 396-CR-139 (AHN), 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2000) ("[I]t appears that there is a substantial legal question as to whether any country to which he fled would enforce any waiver of extr
Page: EFTA00013318 →1 mention
Dec. 20, 2010); United States v. Bohn, 330 F. Supp. 2d 960, 961 (W.D. Tenn. 2004); United States v. Stroh, No. 396 Cr. 139, 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2000); United States v. Botero, 604 F. Supp. 1028, 1035 (S.D. Fla. 1985). . The Department of Justice's Office of International Affairs is
Page: EFTA00015538 →1 mention
ars to be somewhat sparse— perhaps because few defendants attempt such a maneuver—see United States v. Calderon, 15 Cr. 025, 2017 WL 6453344, at *3 (D. Conn. Dec. I, 2017) (discussing the relative lack of specific guidance in the context of an application to modify protective orders in criminal cases), se
Page: EFTA00017808 →Sponsored
1 mention
, No. S 92-CR-437 (PKL), 1992 WL 296440, at *3 *4 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 1992); United States v. Ferguson, No. 3:06-CR-137 (CFD), 2007 WL 4577303, at *3 (D. Conn. Dec. 26, 2007). Maxwell also argues that compulsion of the materials' production under Rule 17(c) is justified because the materials appear not to
Page: EFTA00020302 →1 mention
v. Vickers, No. 13-CR-128-A, 2014 WL 1838255, at *8 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014); United States v. Sensi, No. 3:08-CR-253 (WWE), 2010 WL 2351484, at *3 (D. Conn. June 7, 2010). The sex trafficking charges are therefore not time-barred. Regardless of whether it was the general five-year limitations period in
Page: EFTA00023903 →1 mention
protective orders in the civil context to the criminal context. See, e.g., United States v. Calderon, No. 3:15-CR-25 (JCR), 2017 WL 6453344, at •2 (D. Conn. Dec. I, 2017) (applying the civil standard for the modification of a protective order in a criminal case); United States v. Kerik, No. 07-CR-1027 (L
Page: EFTA00026706 →Sponsored
1 mention
impose a stay on overlapping civil cases during the pendency of a criminal case. See, e.g., Nesbitt v. Berner, 18-CV-00699 (VLB), 2018 WL 5619716 (D. Conn. Oct. 30, 2018) (granting stay of federal Trafficking Victims Protection Act civil after defendant was charged in state court with patronizing a min
Page: EFTA00026738 →1 mention
e identities of .. . victims so that other victims will not be deterred from reporting such crimes." United States v. Paris, 2007 WL 1484974, at *2 (D. Conn. May 18, 2007). Moreover, and consistent with those interests, courts in this Circuit have routinely acknowledged the need to protect victim-witness
Page: EFTA00026751 →1 mention
protective orders in the civil context to the criminal context. See, e.g., United States v. Calderon, No. 3:15-CR-25 (JCH), 2017 WL 6453344, at *2 (D. Conn. Dec. I, 2017) (applying the civil standard for the modification of a protective order in a criminal case); United States v. Kerik, No. 07-CR-1027 (L
Page: EFTA00028056 →Sponsored
1 mention
Dec. 20, 2010); United States v. Bohn, 330 F. Supp. 2d 960, 961 (W.D. Tenn. 2004); United States v. Stroh, No. 396 Cr. 139, 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2000); United States v. Botero, 604 F. Supp. 1028, 1035 (S.D. Fla. 1985). . The Department of Justice's Office of International Affairs is
Page: EFTA00028791 →1 mention
on, 285 U.S. 518 (1932) 8 United States v. Schneider, 801 F.3d 186 (3d Cir. 2015) 14 United States v. Sensi, No. 08 Cr. 253, 2010 WL 2351484 (D. Conn. June 7, 2010) 5 United States v. Vickers, No. 13 Cr. 128 (RJA) (HKS), 2014 WL 1838255 (W.D.N.Y. May 8, 2014) 15 Vernon v. Cassadaga Valley Cent
Page: EFTA00028906 →1 mention
Dec. 20, 2010); United States v. Bohn, 330 F. Supp. 2d 960, 961 (W.D. Tenn. 2004); United States v. Stroh, No. 396 Cr. 139, 2000 WL 1832956, at *5 (D. Conn. Nov. 3, 2000); United States v. Botero, 604 F. Supp. 1028, 1035 (S.D. Fla. 1985). This is for very good reason: Any defendant who signs such a purp
Page: EFTA00030252 →Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 97)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
12 docs12 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
10 docs10 co-mentions
District Court for the Southern District of New York
Organization8 docs8 co-mentions
Alison J. Nathan
Person8 docs8 co-mentions
Second Circuit
Organization8 docs8 co-mentions
Circuit
Organization2008 television film
6 docs6 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
6 docs6 co-mentions
U.S. Attorney's Office
Organization5 docs5 co-mentions
N.D. Cal.
Location4 docs4 co-mentions
Ashcroft
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
Pretrial Services
Organization4 docs4 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonTown in the valley of the Schussen River, in the district of Ravensburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
4 docs4 co-mentions
ST
Stroh
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
Second
Organization4 docs4 co-mentions
Department of Justice
Organization4 docs4 co-mentions
ZA
Zarger
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
BO
Boustani
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
MO
Morrison
PersonTown in Jefferson County, Colorado, United States
4 docs4 co-mentions
Prince Andrew
PersonThird child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh (born 1960)
4 docs4 co-mentions
Gotti
Person2018 crime film directed by Kevin Connolly
3 docs3 co-mentions