re not entitled to pretrial disclosure of witnesses."). 441 See, e.g., United States v. Pearson, 340 F.3d 459, 468 (7th Cir. 2003); United States v. Bejasa, 904 F.2d 137, 139 (2d Cir. 1990); United States v. Barrett, 766 F.2d 609, 617 (ist Cir. 1985); United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904, 910 (6th Cir.

disclosure is "both material to the preparation of the defense and reasonable in light of the circumstances surrounding the case." United States v. Bejasa, 904 F.2d 137, 139-140 (2d Cir. 1990) (cleaned up). Maxwell has made a particularized showing that the Government must produce a witness list reaso

disclosure is "both material to the preparation of the defense and reasonable in light of the circumstances surrounding the case." United States v. Bejasa, 904 F.2d 137, 139-140 (2d Cir. 1990) (cleaned up). Maxwell has made a particularized showing that the Government must produce a witness list reaso

disclosure is "both material to the preparation of the defense and reasonable in light of the circumstances surrounding the case." United States v. Bejasa, 904 F.2d 137, 139-140 (2d Cir. 1990) (cleaned up). Maxwell has made a particularized showing that the Government must produce a witness list reaso