cseceeeeeeees 12 60082) en ae 17 481 1-3721-9459v.3 3930033-000039 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016485 --- PAGE BREAK --- TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, pai SNC, is ee 14 Daily News, L.P. v. Wiley, 126 A.D.3d 511, 6 N.Y.S.3d 19 (1st Dep't 2015) oe ee eeeeeeseeseeseeseseeseeseeeseceeeeeeeeeee

h., 464 U.S. 89 (1983) 8 Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. 204 (2014) 15 Commit. v. Clark, 489 U.S. 726 (1989) 15 Food and Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (2000) 8 Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S., 409 F.3d 106 (2d Cir. 2005) 8 Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. Bonjorno, 494 U.S.

Case 9:08-cv-80ou4-KAM Document "L . Entered L. FLED Docket 09/05/i...d Page 3 of 14 CASE NO.: 08-80804-CrV-MARRA/JOHNSON cite. See Mitchell'. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 294 F.3d 1309, 1314 (11th Cir. 2002) (noting as an undisputed point that someone retains their pre-incarceration domicile for purposes of citizens

ot pertinent here, the presence of third parties is sufficient to undermine the needed confidentiality.") (citation omitted); Liggett Group Inc., v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 116 F.R.D. 205, 210 (M.D.N.C. 1986) (citations omitted) ( "For communications between an attorney and client . . . to be privileged, they must be

not pertinent here, the presence of third parties is sufficient to undermine the needed confidentiality.") (citation omitted); Liggett Group Inc., I Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 116 F.R.D. 205, 210 (M.D.N.C. 1986) (citations omitted) ( "For communications between an attorney and client . . . to be privileged, they must be

USE EXISTS TO UNSEAL THE APPELLATE BRIEFS 10 CONCLUSION 14 4811-3721-9459v.2 3930033-000039 EFTA00805349 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FTC, 710 F.2d 1165 (6th Cir. 1983) 13 Daily News, L.P. v. Wiley, 126 A.D.3d 511, 6 N.Y.S.3d 19 (1st Dep't 2015) 10 Danco Labs., Ltd v. Chem.

own & Williamson Tobacco CS E. v. Wigand, 1996 WL 350827 (Sup. Ct. OS Co. Feb. 28, 1996), affd, 228 ..2r1187, 643 92 (I st Dep't 1996) 25, 26, 27 Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand, 228 lad 187 (1st Dep't 19%) 25, 26 Cazares v. Church of Scientology of Calif, Inc., 444 So.2d 442 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983) 18 Dam

t pertinent here, the presence of third parties is sufficient to undermine the needed confidentiality.") (citation omitted); Liggett Group Inc., v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 116 F.R.D. 205, 210 (M.D.N.C. 1986) (citations omitted) ("For communications between an attorney and client . . . to be privileged, they must be c