nted expansion of federal law to cover conduct that has always been exclusively within the core of state powers. At this point in time, the need for Departmental oversight is critical. We appreciate this opportunity to submit our assessment of the key facts in this case and review of the pertinent federal stat

ted expansion of federal law to cover conduct that has always been exclusively within the core of state powers. At this point in time, the need for Departmental oversight is critical. We appreciate this opportunity to submit our assessment of the key facts in this case and review of the pertinent federal st

ted expansion of federal law to cover conduct that has always been exclusively within the core of state powers. At this point in time, the need for Departmental oversight is critical. We appreciate this opportunity to submit our assessment of the key facts in this case and review of the pertinent federal st

ted expansion of federal law to cover conduct that has always been exclusively within the core of state powers. At this point in time, the need for Departmental oversight is critical. We appreciate this opportunity to submit our assessment of the key facts in this case and review of the pertinent federal st

ted expansion of federal law to cover conduct that has always been exclusively within the core of state powers. At this point in time, the need for Departmental oversight is critical. We appreciate this opportunity to submit our assessment of the key facts in this case and review of the pertinent federal st

pervisory responsibility over the subject matter, or his/her designee, when: 1. Prior consultation or approval would be required by a statute or by Departmental policy for a declination of prosecution or dismissal of a charge with regard to which the agreement is to be made; or 2. The person is: a. A high-

udng you rights a the Soccer:vs ImestorProtectron Act (SIPA) If you luhneanyquogens piresecontect your JAWS, Account Recrerentebeect JPMSI Gambino°, Departmental (212)4812323 In your Jetio,. Pais. POI'rde ne $0400v10 ele rnaten (1) your name and account auntie a) T* dodge amount of the suspected era end (3)e

udng yew rights a the Soccer:vs ImestorProtectron Act (SIPA) If you luhneanyquogens piresecontect your JAWS, Account Recrerentebeect JPMSI Gambino°, Departmental (212)4812323 In your Jetio,. Pais. POI'rde $0400v10 heceerraten (1) your name and account auntie (2) Ter dodge amount of the suspected era end (3)e

utdo; your rents under the &cartes inestorProlectron Act (SIPA) If you have anyquestrons pleasecontact your JPMSI Account Representa&h JAM Compton°, Departmental (212)4832323 In you bep please proodeme Iodating with/Wow (1)you, nano and account nor.** (2)the ether amount d the suspected *nor and (3).• descreb

dng your tights under the &aortas imostorProtectron Ad (SIPA) If you have anyquagons eiroseoantact your JESISI Account Rtaresenlaboocr JAM& Compton°, Departmental (212)4832323 In four knees please ovate me lasomng aihrmaton (1) your name and account number (2) ore deity amount &the suspected error and (3)a dea

g; your rights undo :he SecartearrnestorProkiction Act (SIPA) If you have anyquestons pleesecontact your JPMS, Account Rtoresentetvece JAM& Compton°, Departmental (212)483-2323 In your letre* please stardoms following obi melon (t) your nano and account ranter (2) tra &am amount d the suspected error and Ore d

Chief] Oosterba[an] to participate by teleconference, thereby intercepting the DC meeting. Thoughts? Acosta told OPR that he had no concern about Departmental “scrutiny of the NPA scheme” and that “[i]f anything,” he was concerned whether the Department might direct the USAO to “drop this case.”96 2. Le

rosecution should Epstein renege on his agreement, and she outlined for Acosta and Sloman the steps she proposed to take while Epstein was pursuing Departmental review. Those steps included re-establishing contact with victims, interviewing victims in New York and one victim who lived in a foreign country,

ent had the “right” to address Epstein’s concerns. He told OPR that because the USAO is part of the Department of Justice, if a defendant asks for Departmental review, it would be “unseemly” to object. During his OPR interview, Sloman described Acosta as very process-oriented, which he attributed to Acosta

pervisory responsibility over the subject matter, or his/her designee, when: 1. Prior consultation or approval would be required by a statute or by Departmental policy for a declination of prosecution or dismissal of a charge with regard to which the agreement is to be made; or 2. The person is: a. A high-