Epstein Secrets

hip, unlike the confiden- tial relationship of a doctor and patient or attorney and client, warrants no privilege beyond the terms of Rule 410. See Jaffee, 518 U.S. at 10, 116 S.Ct. at 1928. But the victims would enjoy an evidentiary benefit from the disclosure of plea negotiations to prove whether t

l. Most Cited Cases The court of appeals reviews de novo whether it has jurisdiction to decide an O 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. EFTA00209806 Page 2 749 F.3d 999, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1270 (Cite as: 749 F.3d 999) interlocutory appeal. [2] Federal Courts 170B 13598(1

the Parent-Child Center, Inc. and Dr. Serge Thys are protected by the psychotherapist-patient privilege pursuant to the Supreme Court's decision in Jaffee'. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 116 S.Ct. 1923 3 EFTA00182846 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 114 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/05/2009 Page 4 of 8 a k. v

actual bribery of any public official con- cerning any matter, about any other matter, includ- O 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. hups://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstrcam.aspx?sv=Split&prft=HTMLE&ifin—NotSet&mt... 6/8/2009 EFTA00182790 Page 3 of 5 780 F.2d 929 780 F.2d 9

rican Airlines had made "a • compelling argument for recognition of a limited common law privilege for the ASAP materials." Id. at 1533. Relying on Jaffee, Judge Marcus found that he had the ability "to recognize new privileges, consistent with Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, in cases arisin

o 7-15-11 Westlaw. (C) 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works. END OF DOCUMENT @ 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 2of2 EFTA00177877 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/02/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DIST

merican Airlines had made "a compelling argument for recognition of a limited common law privilege for the ASAP materials." Id. at 1533. Relying on Jaffee, Judge Marcus found that he had the ability "to recognize new privileges, consistent with Rule 501 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, in cases arisin

Review 110XXIV(N) Discretion of Lower Court 110k1153 Reception and Admiss- ibility of Evidence O 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. https://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?pbc=C6E6EBE9&destination=atp&utid=... 9/26/2011 EFTA00177963 Page 3 of 55 Page 3 531 F.3d 197