Epstein Secrets

Tremaine LIP, of counsel) having moved for an Order quashing a subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum issued to McGraw-Hill by Ha Gallo Winery ("Gallo") on October 25, 2004 in stinn ittp://medialaw.bna.conthnedw/disnlav/hateh mint disnlav arin7crarrhid=11711717 EFTA00207298 Meala Law Keporter

.D. Tenn. 2008). 5. Annexed hereto as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush in this proceeding, sworn to on April 30, 2010. 6. Jane Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER,

Tremaine LIP, of counsel) having moved for an Order quashing a subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum issued to McGraw-Hill by Ha Gallo Winery ("Gallo") on October 25, 2004 in stinn ittp://medialaw.bna.conthnedw/disnlav/hateh mint disnlav arin7crarrhid=11711717 EFTA00612031 Meala Law Keporter

.D. Tenn. 2008). 5. Annexed hereto as Exhibit C is the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush in this proceeding, sworn to on April 30, 2010. 6. Jane Doe's brief in opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment dismissing the federal claims in this action ("Si °pp.') may be found on PACER,

there you only saw Ghislaine Maxwell three times? 24 A Not live years. 25 0 Okay. From the end of 2004 through 2005 you ESQUIRE i• A I • ride. Gallo C•apny Toll Free: 866.709.8777 Facsimile: 561.394.2621 Suite 600 4440 PGA Boulevard Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 www.esguiresolutfons.com EFTA

21 A We were given duplicate, duplicate copy. 22 Q Well, let me tell you that I represent three 23 girls that in this case are L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, 24 who were three of the girls that you and I have been 25 talking about as females that went to Mr. Epstein's • ESQUIRE Toll Free: 866.709.8

e recent things. 24 O. I'm going to skip this one because it talks 25 about very similar people that you've already road. • ESQUIRE se Agnate. Gallo [apse, Toll Free: Facsimile: www.esquiresolutions.com EFTA00181420 Larry Eugene Morrison - Volume I October 6, 2009 157 1 A. Okay. 2 0. N

t Las OHS 130.40Velt1 5 Page S41[91650 ran Lo, ie. FL 31394 6 DIRECT EXAMINATION By Mr. Edwards #5 7 CROSS-EXAMINATION On betel d Planter Jane Doe 2 through s By Ms. Ezell *190 T mERUELSTE1N 6 HOROWITZ. PA 9 CROSS-EXAMINATION By Mr. Willits #195 10 BY: JESSICA D. ARBOUR. ATTORMEY.AT4AW.

Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 23, 24 United States v. Forde, 740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 275, 281 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 70 United States v

case. AUSA-1 also does not believe she ever received any such discovery materials. (Ex. 4 at 6). 66 EFTA00077698 requested the same relating to Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN). Because of the ongoing and covert nature of the grand jury investigation, and consistent with its st

Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 23, 24 United States v. Forde, 740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 275, 281 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 70 United States v

case. AUSA-1 also does not believe she ever received any such discovery materials. (Ex. 4 at 6). 66 EFTA00039513 requested the same relating to Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN). Because of the ongoing and covert nature of the grand jury investigation, and consistent with its st

l Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 19, 20 United States v. Forde, 740 F.Supp.2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 183, 189 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 48 United States v

dge Netburn's Order On or about April 9, 2019, the Government advised Judge Netburn, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. 1). Subsequently,

gh the district court found that the defendant's immunized testi- mony had helped lead to the indictment on the gun charge. See also United States Gallo, 859 F.24 1078, 1088 (24 Cir.19 (Van Crasfeiland, J., concurring) ("Licens- ing and taxing statutes aside, the only haz- ards of incrimination that

ied female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen- year-old girl. 17 (8) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or

Airways, Inc., 853 F. Supp. 2d 1209 (S.D. Fla. 2012) 23, 24 United States v. Forde, 740 F. Supp. 2d 406 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) passim United States v. Gallo, No. 98 Cr. (JGK), 1999 WL 9848 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. II, 1999) 275, 281 United States v. Gambino, 838 F. Supp. 744 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 70 United States v

case. AUSA- I also does not believe she ever received any such discovery materials. (Ex. 4 at 6). 66 EFTA00103091 requested the same relating to Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et al., 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN). Because of the ongoing and covert nature of the grand jury investigation, and consistent with its st

preclusion of all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claim

D. Miss. Jan. 11, 2013)... eeeeeeeseeees 24 Gaillard v. Jim’s Water Service, Inc., 535 F.3d 771, 778-779 (8th Cir. 2008)........cssceeseeseeeeeees 22 Gallo v. Ricci, 814 N.Y.S.2d 422, 423 (2006)... eesseescecsseessecseeceseeseesseeeeeeseeeseeeseeeseeesseeseeesaeees 36 Geraty v. Vill. of Antioch, No. 09 C