Epstein Secrets

lows for the discovery sought in Sections II. a-g above and in Defendant's Motion to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978); Dunbar v. U.S., 502 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974); Rossbach v. Rundle, 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 200); Fed.R.Civ.Pr

fendant Jeffrey Epstein) Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Brad Edwards, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Ad

may be in the case.” Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). The correspondence w

Robert C. Josefsberg [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Merm

t bears on, or that reasonably could lead to another matter that could bear on any issue that is or may be in the case.” Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). The correspondence with the government agencies may well point Jane Doe in the direction of admissible evidence, and th

ase 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 485 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/10/2010 Page 26 of 27 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Adam D. Horowitz [email protected] Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 485 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/

y v. Palm Beach Tours & trans., Inc., 242 F.R.D. 685 (S.D. Fla. 2007). See Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 507-08 (1947); Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 351 (1978). In Oppenheimer, the Supreme Court discussed the concept of relevance in relation to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b) and noted tha

fendant Jeffrey Epstein) Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 3 3160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssm(a)sexabuseattorney.

lows for the discovery sought in Sections II. a-g above and in Defendant's Motion to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978); Dunbar v. U.S., 502 F.2d 206 (516 Cir. 1974); Rossbach v. Rundle 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 200); Fed.R.Civ.Pro

fendant Jeffrey Epstein) Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mennelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. Fax: tabus Counsel for Plaintiffs In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08

ENT: Jeffrey Epstein, via video conference Stan Sanders, Videographer 1 2 3 4 Page 134 PROCEEDINGS

/TION.LATIllER & COLEMAN, LIP e 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite HO 33401 11 12 13 t1 15 14 17 18 19 20 On behalf of hint Dons I chrome, 8: ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQUIRE 22 MER).031STEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. l$205 MST= TH8Mv" 23 Suite 73I8 Mimi. Met 33160 21 Om behn lathe Defendant. Jeffrey Eenciir JACK

Austration Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 3340] (561) §20-871] Angust 31, 2007 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Ms. In care of Bruce Lyons, Esq. Lyons and Sanders 600 Northeast 3rd Avenue Fort Landerdale,; FL 33304 Re: Grand Jury investigation—Confidential Dea i This letter is an invitation for you to testif

305-931-0877 By: M. Herman [email protected] Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Florida Bar No. 376980 [email protected] www. hermanlaw.com HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012642 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012643 f> anne. « Case 9:08-cv-80232-K

ard in West Palm Beach Florida. My name is Stan Sanders. I'm the vidcographer representing Visual Eviden

S & LEHRMAN P L ■ EXHIBIT DESCRIPTION PAGE PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 PHOTO 16 0 On behal of Jane s I through t 1 ) PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 JEGE, INC., 24 ADAM D. HOROWITZ. ESQUIRE PASSENGER MANIFEST W1TZ. P A 16 PLAINTIFFS EX. 3 HYPERION AIR, INC., 15 PASSENGER MANIFEST ■ PLAINTIFF'S EX. 6 PHOTO 63 I PLAINTI

n. 16, 1990. Defendant who allegedly breached nonprosecu- lion agreement moved to dismiss indictment or to suppress statements. The District Court, Sanders, Chief Judge, held that: (I) defendant, who refused to cooperate by failing to meet with Government representatives, failing to testify before gra

e 101 v. Epstein Page 7 Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami FL 3 160 Fax: ssmasexabuseattomev.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Re