Epstein Secrets

ainst disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 2

dence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See. e.g., Cox v. Treadway, 75 F.3d 230, 239 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that w

ainst disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 2

dence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See. e.g., Cox v. Treadway. 75 F.3d 230, 239 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that w

ainst disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 2

dence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See. e.g., Cox v. Treadway. 75 F.3d 230, 239 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that w

ainst disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 2

dence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See. e.g., Cox v. Treadway. 75 F.3d 230, 239 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that w

ng the Tanner Scale of Pubertal Development, Dr. Douglas Rogers, a pediatric endocrinologist at the Cleve

The requirement of literal compliance, however, assumes that the objections raise a matter I which ' controverted. For example, in United States Treadway, 328 F.3d 878, 885-86 (6th Cir.200 , petition for cert. filed,No. 02-11197, — U.S.L.W. ---- (U.S. June 9, 2003), where the defendant had not objec

ainst disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 2

dence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See. e.g., Cox v. Treadway. 75 F.3d 230, 239 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that w

gainst disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif, Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211

idence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See, e.g., Cox'. Treadway, 75 F.3d 230 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that witnes

gainst disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. I Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 2

vidence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See, e.g., Cox' Treadway, 75 F.3d 230 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that witnes