Epstein Secrets

67.65. See Affidavit of Michael J. Pike, Esq. See Beecham v. City of West Sacramento, 2009 WL 689729 (E.D.

, her lawyer now claims that Epstein "terrorized Jane Doe No. 3 by crossing paths with her .... " as he ex

Gentlemen: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter H. Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dent Of Counsel During our

17, 2009 David S icer . Robert Critton, Esq. Burman. Critton Luttier & Coleman LLP Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu Goldber er & Weis P.A. Re: Jane Doe 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 09-80591-Civ-Marra Gentlemen: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter R Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dem Of Counsel A

Gentlemen: Robot Cemeck (1934-1978) Welty= H. Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhunt Den Of Counsel During our r

/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. 2 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 Wnt Meer Street. Suite 800. Al'NM FL 33130, Maud Pax 305.358236

Gentlemen: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter H. Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dent Of Counsel During our

Beach, FL 33401 Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jane Doe 101 vs. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 09-80591-Civ-Marra Gentlemen: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter R Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dem Of Counsel A

h, FL 33401 Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter H. Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dern Of Counsel Re: Jeffr

itigtffirt Re: Settlement Negotiations Dear Bob: As per our discussion on September 25th followed by your e-mail and my e-mail, ' Jane Doe 101, Jane Doe 102 and all of your other clients, except for We have also agreed as part of the above settlement to certain additional terms, although it will not

r & Coleman Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter H. Beckham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dern Of Counsel Re: Jeffr

COUNSEL Re: Settlement Negotiations Dear Bob: As per our discussion on September 25 th followed by your e-mail and my e-mail, li g Jane Doe 101, Jane Doe 102 and all of your other clients, except for We have also agreed as part of the above settlement to certain additional terms, although it will not

e where property rights would have been destroyed by criminal proceedings under a void law, and therefore within the exceptions stated in Justice Peckham's opinion in the Young Case. In Truax I Raich, 239 U.S. 33, 36 Sup.Ct. 7, 60 L.Ed. 131, L.R.A. 1916D, 545, Ann. Cas. 1917B, 283, the act was uncon

s. To inform Jane Doe of dates that he had arranged, Evans called Jane Doe on a cellular telephone that she had acquired from him. Evans also gave Jane Doe's cellular telephone number to customers and told Jane Doe to arrange dates when customers called. During the dates, Ev- ans called Jane Doe on the

to trial. She was just 15 years old when she was drawn into Epstein’s exploitative world in 1998. In her civil writ against him, under the pseudonym Jane Doe 102’ she alleged that her duties included being ‘sexually exploited by Epstein’s adult male peers including royalty’. Now, horrified by the evidence

and accusations she was faking iliness Victoria Beckham shows a hint of sideboob and flash of leg as she

s 2s she poses for new fashion eampaign } Harper Beckham is her mathar's blggeed fan ae ‘the five-year-old

e proposed amendment itself, in which all four victims simply allege the same general facts.”)). As the Does argue at length in their Rule 15 Motion, Jane Doe 1’s original petition “specifically allege[s] that the Government was violating not only her rights but the rights of other similarly-situated victims.

lations with was former Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, a close friend of Epstein’s and well-known criminal defense attorney. Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with Dershowitz on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida but also on private planes, in New York, N

ed to t prove them wrong’ 12.2. 2 be b Victoria Beckham shows off her svelte figure in head to toe black