Epstein Secrets

t prosecutorial discretion and the grand jury to judicial scrutiny — exactly the outcome that the CVRA states is disallowed. For example, in In re Petersen, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), an individual and a corporation filed an emergency petition for enforcement of the CVRA, "seeking an orde

rposes of the CVRA definition of 'crime victim,' the only material federal offenses are those for which there is a conviction or plea." Id., citing Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 418 (1979), and In Re 28 Respondent's Exhibit A Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON EFTA00208064 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document

t prosecutorial discretion and the grand jury to judicial scrutiny — exactly the outcome that the CVRA states is disallowed. For example, in In re Petersen, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 8, 2010), an individual and a corporation filed an emergency petition for enforcement of the CVRA, "seeking an orde

rposes of the CVRA definition of 'crime victim,' the only material federal offenses are those for which there is a conviction or plea." Id., citing Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 418 (1979), and In Re 28 EFTA00078862 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 29 of 54 Rendon G

hat prosecutorial discretion and the grand jury to judicial scrutiny exactly the outcome that the CVRA states is disallowed. For example, in In re Petersen, 2010 WL 5108692 (N.D. lnd. Dec. 8, 2010), an individual and a corporation filed an emergency petition for enforcement of the CVRA, "seeking an orde

urposes of the CVRA definition of 'crime victim,' the only material federal offenses are those for which there is a conviction or plea." M., citing Hughey v. United States, 495 U.S. 411, 418 (1979), and In Re 28 EFTA00230093 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 29 of 54 Rendon