Epstein Secrets

the Government (Bates 0001-04), court pleadings filed by the victims themselves or other victims, by Epstein, or by news media organizations (e.g., Bates 00142-88, 00229-31, 281-311, 00668-69), public court rulings on Epstein related matters (e.g., Bates 0008-10, 0012-14. 0036-86, 00190-228), public

cuments apply to which of the victims' document production requests. Instead, the Government has simply taken more than 13,000 pages of documents, Bates stamped them in no particular order (or at least no order that the victims can discern), and then asserted that they are all privileged for various

ntial conflicts of interest that the Justice Department discussed or determined existed for the USAO SDFL, as well as any referral that was made to Main Justice or to any other District, including any documents that EFTA00179731 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 3

he privilege logs that the Government has produced that OPR generated a great deal of correspondence (at least 46 pages) regarding this request. See Bates P- 013909 to P-013955. Of course, improper influences being brought to bear on the Epstein prosecution would support the victims' allegations that t

ntial conflicts of interest that the Justice Department discussed or determined existed for the USAO SDFL, as well as any referral that was made to Main Justice or to any other District, including any documents that EFTA00208640 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 3

he privilege logs that the Government has produced that OPR generated a great deal of correspondence (at least 46 pages) regarding this request. See Bates P- 013909 to P-013955. Of course, improper influences being brought to bear on the Epstein prosecution would support the victims' allegations that t

ntial conflicts of interest that the Justice Department discussed or determined existed for the USAO SDFL, as well as any referral that was made to Main Justice or to any other District, including any documents that EFTA00615901 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 265-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/20/2014 Page 3

EFTA_00170133 EFTA01296801 Page 77 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87203, * United State District Judge TABLE Detail of Privilege and Relevancy Holdings Bates Ruling on Privilege or Relevancy Comment Range (as necessary) 1:000001 Protected from discovery by grand -000039, jury secrecy and opinion work

IDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0022405 EFTA_OOPOI31 EFTA01296799 Page 75 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87203, * that was made to Main Justice or to any other District, including any documents that were transmitted to any other District regarding the conflict and regarding what was to be i

he privilege logs that the Government has produced that OPR generated a great deal of correspondence (at least 46 pages) regarding this request. See Bates P- 013909 to P-013955. Of course, improper influences being brought to bear on the Epstein prosecution would support the victims' allegations that t

ntial conflicts of interest that the Justice Department discussed or determined existed for the USAO SDFL, as well as any referral that was made to Main Justice or to any other District, including any documents that EFTA00081148 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 3

e attached as Exhibit J to the Edwards Declaration accompanying this filing (hereinafter cited as "U.S. Attorney's Correspondence" and referenced by Bates number stamp).' Because Epstein has moved to keep these documents from the public, they are at this time filed under seal with the Court. Threugh-

d these statements have frequently been based on discovery materials. See, e.g., Attorneys Say Miami Prosecutors Violated Crime Victims' Rights Act, Main Justice, March 22, 2011 (quoting Plaintiffs' motion asserting that the U.S. Attorney's Office "deliberately misled' them and claiming that the "only reason