Epstein Secrets

Attorney Southern District of*Florida UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 99 NE 41" STREET MIAMI, FLORIDA 33132-211 1 Jeffrey H. Sloman First Assistant U.S. Attorney 305 961 9299 Cyndee Campos Staff Assistant 305 961 9461 305 530-6444 fax FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET DA

ial aspects or the investigation anti riettraialitms between the parties as well us the icon crop of coil lawsuits filed againit Mr. Epstein by Mr. Sloman's roam: law partner. The untweesgary and arbitrarily imposed deadline set by the I /SAC) ustaz done without any respeo tor (he normal ' and sehed

ports to prohibit any further cantata between Mr. lipskirrk defense learn and U.S. Attorney Acosta. and instead requires us to communicate with the IJSAO only though Mr. Sloman's subordinatcx. While it pains us to say this, this misguided proscouion lion, the ukase! gives (he appearance that il may h

te Burnett F OWL E RWH I T E All'otiNgTS AT LAW B URNETT MIAMI • F00 LAUDERDALE • WraT PALM UfA01 • 5T. PETER5OLMO 3067800201 December 7, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman First Assisiam United States Attorney United Stales Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Jeff: 1-(466 P.002

statute. I would note that the United States provided the draft letter to defense ns a courtesy. in addition, First Assistant United States Attorney Sloman already incorporated in the letter several edits that had been requested by defense counsel. I agree that Section 3771 applies to notice of proceed

fendant gives up certain rights to contest liability for a chill mettle specifically. Ms. • ' not believe there wits room for contention given the IJSAO's, and ultimatums that required that we acquiesce to these unprecedented terns. Concerns Iteaardinu Section 2253 Mr Epstein unconditionally re-as

n your invoices, lead us to believe that there has been a misunderstanding as to your role. With your letter, you enclosed a communication from Mr. Sloman to Judge Davis dated October 25, 2007 and an additional document, presumably also from Mr. Sloman, entitled "PROPOSAL FOR PROCEEDING ONCE ATTORNEY

k of suppo Mt. E ein's offer of $50,000 to resolve claims that are not time-barred (as we believe claim to be), without any On several occasions, IJSAO representatives have asserted that the government takes no position as to the claims of the individuals identified as alleged victims. For the sake

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

utgrowth of the fact that civil settlement. as opposed to restitution. is considered in the Agreement, A. Rule of the Attorney Representative The IJSAO has improperly emphasised that the chosen Bonney representative should be able to litigate the claims of individuals, which violates the terms, and