7
Shared Docs
7
Same-Page
11 / 7
Mentions
gorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence of "significant legal impediments to {federally} prosecuting" what was a quintessentially state case. He als
charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence of "significant legal impediments to {fede
Acosta had > capitulated and not filed federal charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence
gorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence of "significant legal impediments to {federally} prosecuting what was, at heart, a local sex abuse case." He
charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence of "significant legal impediments to {fede
Acosta had > capitulated and not filed federal charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence
in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case against Mr. Epstein was at its core a quintessentially local case of the type prosecuted as solicitation offens
ein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case against Mr. Epstein was at its core a quin
prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai
charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence of "significant legal impediments to {fede
gorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence of "significant legal impediments to {federally} prosecuting what was, at heart, a local sex abuse case." He
Acosta had > capitulated and not filed federal charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence
in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case against Mr. Epstein was at its core a quintessentially local case meaning that it lacked the credible and compe
prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai
in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case against Mr. Epstein was at its core a quintessentially local case meaning that it lacked credible proof that is
prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai
in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case against Mr. Epstein was at its core a quintessentially local case meaning that it lacked the credible and compe
prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai
Entities connected to both Jeffrey Sloman and the Southern District's

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Ken Starr
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSONKuyrkendall
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSONAnn Sanchez
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON