on to enter into the NPA, and files concerning law-enforcement authorities' investigation of Epstein; (5) mandatory CVRA training for employees of the Southern District's United States Attorney's office; and (6) sanctions, *1202 attorneys' fees, and restitution. In August 2019, while the court was considering the par

29- 30. Fifth, the court declined to order "educational remedies," as the government had already agreed to implement CVRA training for employees of the Southern District's *1251 United States Attorney's office. I Id. at 1330. And finally, the court rejected Ms. Wild's request for sanctions, fees, and restitution. See

of the criminal investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators, the status of the investigation, or even disclosed whether she herself is a target of the Southern District's investigation. When Plaintiff's counsel asked Maxwell's counsel for information about the criminal investigation during their meet and confer, Maxw

prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai

prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai

prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai

Acosta had > capitulated and not filed federal charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence

prosecutorial interests because Jeffrey Epstein had a legal team of "high priced" defense counsel was categorically denied in a column authored by the Southern District's then First Assistant Jeffrey H. Sloman which appeared in the Miami Herald on February 15, 2019. Mr. Sloman correctly represented that the case agai

Acosta had > capitulated and not filed federal charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence

Acosta had > capitulated and not filed federal charges because Mr. > Epstein had a "high-priced defense team." This was categorically > denied by the Southern District's then first assistant, > Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed > article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman > correctly represented the existence

of the criminal investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators. the status of the investigation, or even disclosed whether she herself is a target of the Southern District's investigation," Boies wrote. Epstein investigators contacted by 'dozens' since his death EFTA00075115 Caselta52/1435/11.1SlotRmDittctidienOICM

of the criminal investigation into Epstein's co-conspirators. the status of the investigation, or even disclosed whether she herself is a target of the Southern District's investigation," Boies wrote. Epstein investigators contacted by 'dozens' since his death EFTA00084378 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1078-5 F