Epstein Secrets

ark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Judge Filip: In his confirmation hearings last fall, Judge Mukasey admirably lifted up the finest traditions of the Department of Justice in assuring the United

est, we do so now in the recognition that both the Department’s reputation, as well as the due process rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded ma

ark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Judge Filip: In his confirmation hearings last fall, Judge Mukasey admirably lifted up the finest traditions of the Department of Justice in assuring the United

est, we do so now in the recognition that both the Department’s reputation, as well as the due process rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded ma

ark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C, 20530 Dear Judge Filip: | In his confirmation hearings last fall, Judge Mukasey admirably lifted up the finest traditions of the Department of Justice in assuring the Unit

est, we do so now in the recognition that both the Department’s reputation, as well as the due process rights of our client, are at issue. Recently, the Criminal Division concluded a very limited review of this matter at the ' request of U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta. Critically, however, this review deliberately excluded

after September 24, 2007. Also, appeals to the Department of Justice (to both the head of the Criminal Division and then to Deputy Attorney General Filip) by Epstein's counsel contesting whether there was a sufficient jurisdictional basis for the underlying federal investigation were ongoing, see e.g.

monetary reward provisions of 18 U.S.C. 2255 continued after September 24, 2007. Also, appeals to the Department of Justice (to both the head of the Criminal Division and then to Deputy Attorney General Filip) by Epstein's counsel contesting whether there was a sufficient jurisdictional basis for the underlying f

IVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL 9 EFTA00296187 CHRONOLOGY OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DOCUMENTS Date Document 194. 5/28/2008 Letter from Starr and Whitley to Filip it: exigency of previous request for review 195. 6/12/2008, 2:56 pm Email from Epstein to Indyke, forwarding email attaching draft letter re: i

nd Jury (for person and documents or objects) to Riley Kiraly, Custodian of Records and William Riley 51. 8/2/2007 Letter from Sanchez to (Chief, Criminal Division, Office) re: ro osal to resolve matter via a state forum 52. 8/3/2007 Letter from (Chief, Criminal Division) to Sanchez re: two- ear incarcerati