Epstein Secrets

er lllDlate,, including but not- liDiited to, eligibility for gain time credit ·based ori ~dard rules and regulations that Elpply i11 the State of Flonda. A_t the United States' request, Epstein. agrees 'to provide an -acc~W'iting of the gaiQ time he- earned, during his ·period of .n:icarceration. 1

urt sentence would also mean that the federal government was not proceeding.” There is no evidence, however, that he verified this understanding with Sloman or Villafana, let alone the State Attorney. OPR found no indication that Acosta ever communicated, or directed Sloman or Villafana to communicate, hi

tojthe victims regarding the upcoming change of plea, but the Office decided dial victim notification could only come from a state investigator, and Jeff Sloman asked PBPD Cliief Reiter to assist.” On Saturday, June 28,2008, VillafanajemailedSloman to inform him tliat PBPD Cliief Reiter “is going to notify vi

ision to resolve the case through the NPA or in the negotiations leading to the agreement: former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, and former AUSAs Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, Andrew C. Lourie, and Ann Marie C. Villafana. Each subject submitted written responses detailing their involvement in the federa

n the CVRA litigation; Outlook data collected to respond to production requests in that case; a set ofEpstein case documents maintained by Acosta and Sloman; computer files regarding the Epstein case collected by Sloman; Villafafia’s Outlook data; Acosta’s hard drive; and the permanently retained official

Scuds Florida P I ! NIS* I »rimy emir »die . Recent Activity I • e You mod to be lugged mu t ic.b,..nJ, 1$ $ yt I di' altMly Cerablite: Fonda House Con 'wine.' Bain A free-speech battle Is 'nu. 1,111 peeps shared du,. in Foreclosure OM. fed -up fide/gel end( dorm disorder In the courts

-Justiee-Deparnnent-emitast-any-vistimsr including fer-example-Jane-Dee44-r abeut-their-views-en4he-nen-preseeutiem 26. On about December 6, 2007, Jeffrey H. Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney sent a letter to Jay Lefkowitz, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit neting-the ttemeyie EpsteM-Ple-lette

ation would continue, possibly leading to a federal prosecution. Edwards Declaration at ¶ 8. a On about November 27, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeff Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Lefkowitz, defense counsel for Epstein, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit The e-mail-statedt—that-the-1478,Atiem

overnment reached any final mseimien-ef-that-investigatienr Edwards-Deelaratien-at--11-147 33. On about February 25, 2008, Assistant U.S. Attorney Sloman sent an e-mail to Jay Leflcowitz„ a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit _.Bpsteinls—eriminal—defense eeunselr explaining that the Justice D

ormation, you may contact our office at 305-961-9001, or you may send a written inquiry to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Flonda, 99 NE 4th Street, Miami, F'. 33132. http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/f1s/PressReleases/090610-01.html 6/11/2009 EFTA00189812 Campos, Cyndee (USAFLS)

l misrepresentations resulted in a claimed tax refund that was significantly greater than what the client was legitimately entitled to receive. Mr. Sloman commended the investigative efforts of the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigation Division. This case is being prosecuted by Assistant Uni

thern District of Florida Press Release MIAMI RETURN PREPARER PLEADS GUILTY TO TAX PREPARATION FRAUD SCHEME June 10, 7009 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Jeffrey H. Sloman, Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, and Daniel W. Auer, Special Agent in Charge, Internal Revenue Service, Criminal

any other inmate, including but not limited to, eligibility for gain time credit based on ruusdud role, and regulations that apply In the State of Fonda. Al the United Sias' toques«. Epstein *gnu M provide en accounting of the gain time he eamwd during his period of Incer«ration. I3. the ponies an

ith a copy of the prosecution memo related to the indictment. On September 7, 2007, Epstein's attorneys met with the U.S. Attorney, Drew Oosterbaan, Jeff Sloman, John McMillan, and I. Ken Starr presented federalism arguments, urging deferral to state prosecution. When those arguments failed, Epstein's attor

8-80736-CV-MARRA P-0 I 1789 EFTA00192835 Memorandum Subjeci Operation Leap Year: Notification of Breach USAO No. 2006R0 181 June 9, 2009 To Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney Robert K. Senior First Assistant U.S. Attorney Rolando Garcia Deputy Chief, Criminal Division, West Palm Beach Ka

half of which the individual acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal DilyhA Ch— Notary Public yt Notary Public State of Flonda # g% Deborah C Knowlton = My Commission GG 133867 Bye Expires 11/20/2021 ne 4 $ NADAS HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018029 EXHIBIT 13 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018030

was categorically denied by the Southern District’s then first assistant, Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman correctly represented the existence of “significant legal impediments to [federally] prosecuting” what was a quintessentially state case. He also co

federal charges because Mr. Epstein had a “high-priced defense team.” This was categorically denied by the Southern District’s then first assistant, Jeffrey H. Sloman, in an Op-Ed article in The Miami Herald on Feb. 15. Mr. Sloman correctly represented the existence of “significant legal impediments to [federally]

and the integrity of both the grand jury and the ptesidingjudge." State v. Clemmons, 150 I - So,2ci231, 233-34 (Fla,, 1963).4 'Tl]n states such as Flonda, where the wahd jury is pr~served, it is an important appendage _of the-court which impanels it ... [and] it should n·ot be forgotten thatthe judge

he FBI commenced its own investigation, then-U.S. Attorney for the Southern District ofFlorida, Alexander Acosta, asked First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman whether it was “appropriate to approach [State Attorney Krischer] and give him a heads up re where we might go?” Sloman replied, “No for fear that it