Epstein Secrets

s amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), and Pierce Cou

numerated in article 1.B, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Petitioners contend the Guidelines did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone'. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). Thus, Congress's

.S.C. § 3771(a)(1) — (8), "a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." At no time was Epstein ever charged with an offense in Federal district

amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995). Thus, Congress'

.S.C. § 3771(a)(1) — (8), "a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." At no time was Epstein ever charged with an offense in Federal district

s amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), and Pierce Cou

numerated in article 1.B, a victim is 'a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia' (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)) if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Petitioners contend the Guidelines did not prevent the U.S. Attorney's