Epstein Secrets

eed, the conduct here can be compared to that of Barry Kutun, a former North Miami city attorney accused

to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. 17 EFTA00225823 (58) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. (59) On or about July 17, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's

Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 1) Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to perform, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way,

e of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe [Jane Doe #lp] too". 20 EFTA00225820 (83) On or about December 30, 2004

others. However, as I stated on Sunday, the Office cannot and will not bind Immigration. Also, your timetable will need to move up significantly. As Barry said in our meeting last week, his office can put together a plea agreement, information, and get you all before the judge on a change of plea withi

to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M.. C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. I ). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).= Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

eples, Earl & Blank, P.A., Miami, for appellee. Barry M. Hartman, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Dexter W. L

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

d to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).2 Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-

specifically told you that was unacceptable, and Barry Krischer also has informed us that he will not k

o. 2: (a) Letter to Miss C.W., dated June 7, 2007, RE: Crime Victims' and Witnesses' Rights (2 pages); Author: A. Marie Villafana. Letter to Miss T.M., dated August 11, 2006, RE: Crime Victims' and Witnesses' 1 EFTA00191186 Rights (2 pages); Author: A. Marie Villafana. Letter to C.W., dated Jan

unday North Palm Beach criminal defense attorney Barry Maxwell said he is not surprised that federal cha

upon conviction, did not require sex offender registration. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. Both were victims of Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. Both Jane Does were identified through the Palm Be