Epstein Secrets

defendant's Compaq Presario notebook computer. Barry Gummow, a computer forensic examiner, was called

See United States Soto-Beniquez, 356 F.3d I, 52 (1st Cir.2004) ("Any possible prejudice to [defendant] from the government's non-compliance [with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32] was cured by the district court's two-week continuance to give defense counsel an ad- equate opportunity to respondlo the gove

sher. OPR also interviewed former State Attorney Barry Krischer and former Assistant State Attorney Lan

evidence. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility of their obtaining monetary damages through either a c

''1lll1°&'1ch PDhitclligcilcc Rcportli/28/04) Plaintifl's fahibit No.'2 31 14 (incident.Reports) Plainiifl's Exhibit No. 3 99 .15 (Letter;to· Barry krischer) Plaintiffs Exhibit No.A • 131 16 (Photographs of.El Brill<> Way) :Plaihtitl's Exhibit No. 5 • 132 n (Phcito of358 El. BriHo \Y,ay)

as evidence. See Fed! R. Crim. P. 11(f) (“The admissibility or inadmissibility of a plea, a plea discussion, and any related statement is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 410.”). In any case, the victims could have been impeached regarding the possibility' of their obtaining monetary damages through either a ci