Epstein Secrets

he "tinned Kingdom-United Stater Agreement Concerning Obtaining Evidence From Cayman Islands With Regard to Narcotics Activities." The gravamen of Harvey's argu- ment is that the United States may obtain evi. had granted Harvey both transactional im- munity and use immunity for any informa- tion he had

89) 7201,' and one count of filing a false income tax return in April of 1981, a viola- tion of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1).1 The govern- ment alleges that Harvey kept millions of dollars derived from his lucrative drug dealings in a bank account in the Cayman Islands. In his individual income tax re- turn f

phone calls to a telephone used bpane Doe #7. (48) On or about July 5, 2004, Defendant SARAH KELLEN placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. 14 EFTA00191737 (49) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-yea

EFFREY EPSTEIN employed L.G. to perform, among other things, services as a personal assistant. 3. Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN paid T.M., H.R., and A.F. to pe orrn, among other things, recruiting services. 4. Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at 358 El Brillo Way,

EFFREY EPSTEIN caused a payment of $200 to be paid to Jane Doe #6. Jane Does #7 and #8 (46) In or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led T.M., who was then a fifteen-year-old gikand Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-years-old girl, from the kitchen of 358 El Brillo Way upstairs to Defen

o busy to care enough ... and by a court system that simply did not have a place for them." 150 CONG. REc. 54262 (Apr. 22. 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein). To remedy this problem, Congress gave victims "the simple 8 EFTA00177347 Case 9:08-cv 6-KAM Document 9 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/1 IS Page

d to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).? Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-

se the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as a victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not i

victim by both the FBI Victim-Witness Specialist and AUSA Villafafia. Id., 3. Petitioner's counsel, Brad Edwards, Esq., currently represents C.W., T.M., and S.R. The U.S. Attorney's Office victim notification letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. and the letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by AUSA V

information concerning specific federal statutes." Based on Mr. Thomas' contemporaneous notes. that assertion appears to be false. For example, Mr. Weinstein told Mr. Thomas that federal authorities believed that Mr. Epstein had hired girls over the telephone and traveled in interstate corn incite for th

ee of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephoF message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephone call received from T.M. and Jane Doe #12 that stated: "They are available all weekend and maybe pane Doe #13] too". 20 EFTA00225764 (83) On or about December 30, 2004,

or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (58) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call telephone used by T.M. (59) On or about July 17, 2004, one of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's employees prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's

a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. D (56) On or about July 15, 2004, Defendant placed a telephone call to a telephone used by T.M. (57) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendant placed one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. (58) On or about July 16, 2004

oo busy to care enough ... and by a court system that simply did not have a place for them." 150 CoNG. REC. S4262 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein). To remedy this problem, Congress gave victims "the simple right to know what is going on, to participate in the process where the information tha

om your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to two of Bradley Edwards clients, T.M. and C.W.' The letter to C.W. was hand-delivered by the FBI agents. The letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she wa

e from the Office had communicated the victim list to Epstein, attorneys for Epstein made contact with the Office complaining of the designation of T.M. as a victim. Epstein's attorneys used the designation of T.M. as a basis to allege prosecutorial misconduct against 3The indictment contained no re

-2/27/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, David Weinstein, Robert Senior, Karen Atkinson, and Rolando Garc

t Deliberative Process P-014440 12/11/2007 email from Marie Villafafia to Jeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with lawyer for Jane Doe #2 (T.M.) Work Product Deliberative Process P-014441 12/12/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia, Frederica Devlin, and Bob Senior regarding planning indi

-2/27/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, David Weinstein, Robert Senior, Karen Atkinson, and Rolando Garc

t Deliberative Process P-014440 12/11/2007 email from Marie Villafafta to Jeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with lawyer for Jane Doe #2 (T.M.) Work Product Deliberative Process P-014441 12/12/2007 emails between Marie Villafafta, Frederica Devlin, and Bob Senior regarding planning indi

-2/27/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, David Weinstein, Robert Senior, Karen Atkinson, and Rolando Garc

t Deliberative Process P-014440 12/11/2007 email from Marie Villafafta to Jeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with lawyer for Jane Doe #2 (T.M.) Work Product Deliberative Process P-014441 12/12/2007 emails between Marie Villafafta, Frederica Devlin, and Bob Senior regarding planning indi

motion for partial summary judgment. DE 327. EFTA00185458 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 2 of 57 Sen. Feinstein). In passing the CVRA, Congress mandated a series of rights for crime victims. Sadly, several years later, when the Government began handling this c

with Ken Starr P-014440 12/11/2007 email from to and Alex Acosta Work Product Deliberative Process regarding call with lawyer for Jane Doe #2 (T.M.) P-014441 12/12/2007 emails between and Work Product Deliberative Process 6(e) regarding planning indictment review P-014442 12/14/2007 em

he National Academy of Sciences, 104(2), 565-569; Harvey, J.A., Brezemer, T.M., Gols, R., Nakamatsu, Y., &

llion years of specialized cryptic morphology and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(2), 565-569; Harvey, J.A., Brezemer, T.M., Gols, R., Nakamatsu, Y., & Tanaka, T. (2008). Comparing the physiological effects and function of larval feeding in closely-related endoparasitoids

o busy to care enough ... and by a court system that simply did not have a place for them." 150 CONG. REC. S4262 (Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Feinstein). To remedy this problem, Congress gave victims "the simple right to know what is going on, to participate in the process where the information tha

n conviction, would not require sex offender registration. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. Both were victims of Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old. Both Jane Does were identified through the Palm Be