Epstein Secrets

orney General were consulted, received legal submissions, and fully approved the exercise of discretion by the heads of the USAO-SDFL. In the end, the Executive Branch exercised, in good faith, the unreviewable prosecutorial discretion afforded to it by Article II of the Constitution, as even recognized by Congres

ney Alex Acosta and his team into giving Epstein a sweetheart deal" has been soundly debunked; 11 EFTA00299031 there is no such evidence — NONE. Sloman, Alex Acosta Acted with Professionalism, Miami Herald Op-Ed, supra. The NPA was and is a valid and binding agreement. It contains no illegal provis

estigation was led by honorable federal prosecutors with outstanding reputations, including but not limited to: R. Alexander Acosta (U.S. Attorney), Jeffrey Sloman (First Assistant U.S. Attorney), Matthew Menchel (Chief, Criminal Division), Andrew Lourie (Deputy Chief, Northern Region), and AUSA Anna Marie Vil

notify her of a public hearing, etc. I do not believe the statute allows the victim to interfere with the exercise of prosecutorial discretion by the Executive Branch. Dexter From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:43 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Acosta, A

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:07 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS); Jacobus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Suit against United States Ann Marie, We w

notify her of a public hearing, etc. I do not believe the statute allows the victim to interfere with the exercise of prosecutorial discretion by the Executive Branch. Dexter From: \defend, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 3:43 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Acosta, Ale

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:14 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Jacobus, Wendy (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Suit against United States Ili Dexter — Thank you. Jeff and I discussed this and we reached t

predators accountable. Boonma maintains that dismissing this case would clearly disregard United States public policy expressed by Congress and the Executive Branch. •10 Although the court recognizes that Congressional enactments and Administration policy evidence the intent to combat sex crimes again

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Vi°Mena. Ann Mane C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday. July 31, 2007 1:37 PM To: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Menchel, Matthew (USAFLS); Lourie. Andrew (USAFLS) Subject: Emailing: Conf Plea Negotiations.wpd Attachments: Conf Plea Negotiati

t responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “

d not be countenanced. That is all the more true under the circumstances where the duly appointed U.S. Attorney opined that, in effect, the “unitary” Executive Branch was driving this prosecution. We now know that is not so. What I respectfully request, and what I hope you will provide, is a truly “de novo” review

t responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “

There is no support for CEOS’s view that the courts or a jury should ultimately decide whether a “novel” construction of the law is correct. Instead, the Executive Branch itself has a non-delegable obligation not to exceed its authority; the power of other branches to check or remedy such usurpation does not legitimize