Epstein Secrets

stein, and how she could assert that claim. Despite her attempts to rationalize her actions in January 2009, 2 In their reply, petitioners refer to Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and contend that, "[t]hat firm had to work within the confines of that Government assignment and direction and therefore could not, and did

D.E. 310- 1, 1 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida, signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana, on behalf of United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. D.E. 291-1 at 17-20. Jane Doe No. 3

ould have consulted with her attorney regarding the CVRA lawsuit mentioned in the September 3, 2008 letter.3 2 In their reply, petitioners refer to Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and contend that, "[t]hat firm had to work within the confines of that Government assignment and direction and therefore could not, and did

D.E. 310- 1, ¶ 34. Exhibit 1 to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-1), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida, signed by Assistant gEhEimesteposseillekete, on behalf of United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. D.E. 291-1 at 17-20. Jane Doe No. 3 even goe

and how she could assert that claim. Despite her attempts to rationalize her actions in January 2009, it is 2 In their reply, petitioners refer to Podhurst Orseck, P.A., and contend that, "[t]hat firm had to work within the confines of that Government assignment and direction and therefore could not, and did n

D.E. 310-1, ¶ 34. Exhibit I to her earlier statement of January 19, 2015 (D.E. 291-I), is the notification letter from the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida, signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana, on behalf of United States Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. D.E. 291-1 at 17.20. Jane Doe No. 3

In re: Jane Doe, 08-8073649 233. 5/5/2009 Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, 08- CV-80119 t5 Robert Josefsberg, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., attorney representative. 46 Robert Critton, Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP. 4 Office, Southern District of Florida. , attorney for

efkowitz, attaching draft non-prosecution agreement 3° Jay Leflcowitz, Kirkland & Ellis LLP. k Srebnick Komspan & Stumpt P.A. 32 U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of Florida. PRIVILEGED & CONFIDENTIAL 3 EFTA00296181 CHRONOLOGY OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S DOCUMENTS Date Document 69. 9/17/2007, 1:11 pm Email from to Lef