3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
1, 1 27. In her April 7, 2011 interview with Mr. Scarola, Jane Doe No. 3 stated that she was contacted in
cause they were aware of the original plaintiffs' timely claims. The appellate court rejected this argument, citing this passage from Young ex rel. Nutramax Litig. Trust'. Lepone 305 F.3d 1 (I' Cir. 2002): [W]e repudiate the conceit that an action filed by one plaintiff gives a defendant notice of the impendi
11- 27. In her April 7, 2011 interview with Mr. Scarola, Jane Doe No. 3 stated that she was contacted in
cause they were aware of the original plaintiffs' timely claims. The appellate court rejected this argument, citing this passage from Young ex rel. Nutramax Litig. Trust I. Lepone, 305 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2002): [W]e repudiate the conceit that an action filed by one plaintiff gives a defendant notice of the impe
1, r 27. In her April 7, 2011 interview with Mr. Scarola, Jane Doe No. 3 stated that she was contacted in
cause they were aware of the original plaintiffs' timely claims. The appellate court rejected this argument, citing this passage from Young ex rel. Nutramax Litig. Trust I. Lepone, 305 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2002): [W]e repudiate the conceit that an action filed by one plaintiff gives a defendant notice of the impe
Entities connected to both Jack Scarola and Nutramax Litig

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSONRobert C. Josefsberg
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
Weissing
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Podhurst Orseck
ORGANIZATIONFISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSONSouthern District
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATIOND.E.
ORGANIZATION