Epstein Secrets

the attached letter providing notice of a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement on attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding ova a hearing on Jeffrey Epstein's motions to stay all of the civil lawsuits filed against him by victims identified through our i

Apr-el lo ()Writ( Judge from Magistrate Judgment VI. RELATED/RE-FILED (50C IsSINMONIO • CASE(S). word perk a) Re-filed Case OYES 9) NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases OYES ONO DOCK MBETER See Attached NU VII. CAUSE OF ACTION CI e Ilse U.S. Civil Statute under Mikis you ere filing and Wnie a Br

s for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding ova a hearing on Jeffrey Epstei

o. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-01 1790 EFTA00192836 and the United States. Accordingly, I recommend that we provide Epstein's counsel with Notice of the Breach at the hearing on June 12th, and proceed to indictment promptly thereafter. BACKGROUND In the summer of 2006, the FBI approached the U.S. Attorney'

the attached letter providing notice of a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement on attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding over a hearing on Jeffrey Epstein's motions to stay all of the civil lawsuits filed against him by victims identified through our

s for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding over a hearing on Jeffrey Epste

IDENTIAL ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT EFTA00189787 and the United States. Accordingly, I recommend that we provide Epstein's counsel with Notice of the Breach at the hearing on June 12th, and proceed to indictment promptly thereafter. BACKGROUND In the summer of 2006, the FBI approached the U.S. Attorney'

: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and

ing that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to an

tunc to an "Order of Community Control I," which directly contradicted the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. This required a fourth Notice of Breach and another claim that there was no "intended breach" followed by a meaningless "cure." During my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12th rega