Epstein Secrets

r filed charges against Jeffrey Epstein or any other person involved in criminal activity with Ms.M. 14. In the Jane Doe suit, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra allowed limited discovery. Exhibits 1 and 2 were listed on a privilege log and provided to Judge Marra in camera for review. The United States asse

Jane Doe suit, U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra allowed limited discovery. Exhibits 1 and 2 were listed on a privilege log and provided to Judge Marra in camera for review. The United States asserted that the items should not be produced because they were governed by Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) and incl

2 were listed on a privilege log and provided to Judge Marra in camera for review. The United States asserted

#3 P-012130 Thru P-012150 Declaration o i 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

ilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assistant United States

18, 2008, attorney Katherine Ezell representing some of Epstein's victims emailed the line prosecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I know, Judge Man has not ever seen the agreement or these notification letters.... 1 don't know if t

osecutor, asking whether the NPA was "blessed" by Judge Marra. The line prosecutor emailed back: "As far as I

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru PM 12167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I

ilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A.

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

ilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Assis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, I

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

tion is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this day of , 2007, at West Palm Beach, Florida. cc: AUSA Roy Black, Esq. William Richey, Esq. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE West Palm Beach EFTA00179097 (Rev. 06/2005)Seakd Document Tracking Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern Dis

Roy Black, Esq. William Richey, Esq. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE West Palm Beach E

of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas, the Declaration of , and the Ex Parte Declaration Number Two in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas for the following reasons: 1. The attached documents contain information relating to an ongoing grand jury investigation; thus, pursuan

RA Action. All of the settlements were confidential, so it is unknown how much each of the victims received. In September 2010, U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra, who handled most of the civil cases and the CVRA Action, issued an Order closing the CVRA Action. Almost immediately thereafter, the Petitioners f

t have to chase down. Jim Eisenberg 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013875 EFTA00191388 Memorandum Subject Re

"Him P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Pane Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

aration for hearing 3.00 hr $1,500.00 04/01/2009 RDC Telephone conference with Jack G re: Bob J 0.20 hr $100.00 04/01/2009 RDC Hearing with Marra; conference with Brad; conference with Jack 2.10 hr $1,050.00 04/01/2009 RDC Conference with Pike and JMB re: discovery; telephone conference wi

mail correspondence regarding reply in support of Motion to Quash 0.40 hr $120.00 04/15/2009 RHB Legal research regarding case law in Plaintiffs Response to Motion to Quash 1.10hr $330.00 04/15/2009 RHB EW - Review Amended Complaint regarding criminal allegations 0.50 hr $150.00 04/15/2009 RHB EW - Draft Reply

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petiti

Thru P-012150 Declaration of Joseph Recarey 6(e) Box #3 P-012151 Thru P-012167 Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas 6(e) Investigative Privilege Also contains information subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs

wo in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash Subpoenas," "Supplement to Ex Parte Declaration Number One in Support of United States' Response to Motion to Quash," indictment preparation materials); 21 ("complete indictment package," "indictment preparation binder"); 23 ("complete indictment package"). EFTA