Epstein Secrets

2 of 11 JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08- 80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defen

ive antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. IL THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED

2 of 11 JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08- 80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defen

ive antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. IL THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED

2 of 11 JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08- 80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defen

ive antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. IL THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED

F FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defen

e antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly, Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases. II. THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGE