Epstein Secrets

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, -vs- JEFFRE

ou there? 25 A. I was in there for the eighth grade again, Page 197 1. Q. For what? What had you done that brought 2 about you getting sent to Milton? 3 MR. EDWARDS: Fenn. 4 THE WITNESS: I crashed my grandmother's car. 5 BY MR. CRITTON: 6 EsonY7 7 A. I crashed my grandmother's car. 8 Q.

of that. 13 A. 14 Q. 15 A. 16 Q. 17 A. 18 Q. 19 A. 20 Q. 21 A. 22 Q. 23 A. 24 Q. 25 A. Yes. Where Is Milton located? In Milton, Florida Which is where? Which is near Okaloosa County. sort)/ Near Okaloosa. Where is Okaloosa? In the Panhandle. And were you required to go

ttlement Conference, or in the Alternative, Motion to Direct Parties back to Mediation, Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-CV-80893 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2010) (Marra, J.) (doc. #168) attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Notably, Epstein sought this settlement conference — and ultimately made his payments as a result

there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe's case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein simply chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

It is not enough for the opposing party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (F1a.1979) (same). Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion supported by

h Amendment right not to do so. "Stonewalling and delaying," Horowitz said. "I'm not surprised." Horowitz said he has asked US. District Judge Kenneth Marra to order Epstein to turn over the information. A local attorney for Epstein, Jack Goldberger, did not respond to a re- quest seeking comment. E

isclosure will be ordered." Seeking to keep the agreement sealed, Assistant U.S. Attorney argued that the agreement is not part of any case before Marra. "The non-prosecution agreement has never been filed under seal in federal court," he wrote. He also denied that the agreement has been inaccuratel

twitme • May rot WOW sari Orcaa of .,.'au Sotto* Pato Bole Coot, Novo 4crties Once Stgl GRAPMC $385.8 mil on . $12 billon $8.5 billion 5308 4 Milton $1.0 LAM $7.6 billion 20.1% -12.0% -10.2% $1.9 billion $1.0 bilien 1307,4 rrilion 3972.3 million $7124 rr.l'icn 51.8 billion 5838.8 $1.5

cel Saxes hc. IOW Kart« 164.68 lbw Weivalwi. N) 07086. Ann INSUBSA Senor: CM ix *mess sow as >coca dyoudinkyur sinter weeks 6 %VON ads° need mow Marra, Lout atradh cn the stamina or ream The Frem re Card .tux( (as asHate)mutt hear Wm >at no later thr 60 ~after the Tmi wit you the fist stamens on

en amine. coma° your Franca 34mOr • Praia intramima and endured 'wawa Mate Monona amain anclidng Aired pagnpation pagan and realnun n*somem train Milton/an gruchred petedS aeg4aeray hghly Olen/ ("in deurtaed Koalas l'aot not Dart regmered with the Staireolk and &thane Cannssisn a under any State S

the status of new york? Thanks 1020 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014919 EFTA00225323 • FD-302 (Rcv. 104-95)

08-80736-CV-MARRA P4M3645 EFTA00225326 WOW Mew. 10495) 31E-MM-108062 COrUinuatiOA of FD-302 of .0n 05/28/2008 .r.se Residential Facility in Milton, Florida. stated she was in the drug program for 5 months, one week an 3 days. Epstein offered to pay an extra $100.00 to if she brought additio

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal entirpitge that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing ever clients intended to pursue an appeal of that dismi

1966), It is not enough for the —— party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (Fla.1979) (same). | Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion supported by

at there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein sinisly chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct