Epstein Secrets

federal prosecutorial authority. IO 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001653 EFTA00209832 KIRKLAND & ELLIS

ted expansion of federal law to cover conduct that has always been exclusively within the core of state powers. At this point in time, the need for Departmental oversight is critical. We appreciate this opportunity to submit our assessment of the key facts in this case and review of the pertinent federal st

2006 FORM 0RD-227 /AN 36 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-0002 I3 EFTA00223896 RETURN OF SERVICE' RE

pervisory responsibility over the subject matter, or his/her designee, when: 1. Prior consultation or approval would be required by a statute or by Departmental policy for a declination of prosecution or dismissal of a charge with regard to which the agreement is to be made; or 2. The person is: a. A high-

10 5 FORM ORD-227 JAN.86 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-000213 EFTA00226396 RETURN OF SERVICE' REC

pervisory responsibility over the subject matter, or his/her designee, when: 1. Prior consultation or approval would be required by a statute or by Departmental policy for a declination of prosecution or dismissal of a charge with regard to which the agreement is to be made; or 2. The person is: a. A high-

lea deal,” Miami Herald, Dec. 6, 2018. 5 Doe v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201 (S.D. Fla., Feb. 21, 2019) (Opinion and Order, 9:08-80736-CIV- Marra). v Secretary of Labor. In a brief oral statement, Acosta explained that continued media attention on his handling of the Epstein investig

Chief] Oosterba[an] to participate by teleconference, thereby intercepting the DC meeting. Thoughts? Acosta told OPR that he had no concern about Departmental “scrutiny of the NPA scheme” and that “[i]f anything,” he was concerned whether the Department might direct the USAO to “drop this case.”96 2. Le