Epstein Secrets

57 established in the NPA after learning that another attorney established through the NPA would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages" without info

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

z.5 At the same time (and until as recent] as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar websitc continued to identify Mr. as a named partner in Mr. Herman's firm. See Tab 31, Florida Bar Website page. 39. Mr. Herman, who is the named partner in the former firm of Herman, , & Mermelstein, filed five

t of Florida to discontinue its involvement in this matter, and return responsibility for this case to the State of Florida. 17 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001686 EFTA00209865 Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Jay Lefkowitz [[email protected]] Sent: y, September 27, 2007 2:53 PM To: ,

57 established in the NPA after learning that another attorney established through the NPA would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages" without info

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

57 established in the NPA after learning that another attorney established through the NPA would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages" without info

00076 (Exhibit II); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MR 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); REP WPB 000235-000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); REP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

57 established in the NPA after learning that another attorney established through the NPA would be making unsolicited contacts to the victims. Mr. Herman explained that the notification letters were "misleading" because they referred generally to a waiver of "any other claim for damages" without info

0076 (Exhibit 11); RFP WPB 000220 (Exhibit 12); RFP MIA 000077- 000087 (Exhibit 13); RFP MIA 000088 (Exhibit 14); RFP WPB 000235.000244 (Exhibit 15); RFP WPB 000107- 000112 (Exhibit 16); RFP WPB 002188 (Exhibit 17); RFP WPB 000266-000277 (Exhibit 18); RFP MIA 000113 (Exhibit 19); RFP MIA 000151-000160 (Ex

r § 2255. Moreover, these women stated that they did not, now or in the past. consider themselves to be victims. • During the last few months, Mr. Herman, First Assistant Sloman's thriller law partner, has tiled several civil lawsuits against Mr. Epstein on behalf of the alleged "victims." It is our

in effect, nor did CEOS review the federal prosecutors' inappropriate Wens to implement those terms. We detail this point below. 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001616 EFTA00184938 -`eat'iit FaCvNio %MAW. eauti;7nt 362-mriCigri iipirgy Docket 02/10/2016 Paij.Q34-3— hn IK.ON NON 13:22 FAX 1 213 8500 KIONI