Epstein Secrets

ence. This reinforces the fact that no telephonic or Internet persuasion, inducement, enticement or coercion of any kind occurred. Furthermore, Mr. Herman, the attorney for most of the civil complainants, was quoted in the Palm Beach Post as saying that "it doesn't matter" that his clients lied about t

m to be. It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence supporting its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina'. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 5.O. 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

ews (07/01, Hillyard, Gallo, Lebowitz), CNBC (07/01, Rozzelle), MSNBC (07/01, Benen), USA Today (07/01, Jansen, Waddick), The Guardian (07/01, Yang, Herman), Newsweek (07/01, Venegas), Deadline (07/01, Johnson), The Hill (07/01, Sforza), Axios (07/01, Saricd), New York Post (07/01, Christenson), and Ro

), NPR (07/01, Totenberg), MSNBC (07/01, Rubin), New York Post (07/01, King), Vanity Fair (07/01, Lutz), NY]. (07/01, Tasolides), and People (07/01, Alford). Trump Ally Steve Bannon Surrenders to Federal Prison to Serve 4-Month Sentence on Contempt Charges The Associated Press (07/01, Whitehurst, Haigh

rmer law partner, has tiled several civil lawsuits against Mr. Epstein on behalf of the alleged "victims." ft is our understanding that each of Mr. Herman's clients arc on the EFTA00225684 UO/V4IV9 sun CAA OVO 00V O1%V 05/28/2008 00:09 FAX 2026161230 DA VON 13:24 KAX 1 :13 660 6500 LSGVUAAVD Ur

them to be, It should be noted that the SDFL has never provided you with any evidence suppolg its investigation. This is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct: 160 (1970)). Ultimately, you requested an independent review. Subsequent to the

ions and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next Confidential end Privileged —Attorney Work Product -12- Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-01

55", clearly prevents Mr. Epstein from fulfilling the material terms and conditions the Agreement. As you know, this is not, and has never been, an Alford plea situation (see North Carolina I Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160 (1970)). Your reference to requiring "Mr. Epstein to in essence admit guilt,