Epstein Secrets

gs with the Florida Division of Corporations and/or the Florida Bar. On 08, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of . Herman said that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next Confidential and Privileged— Attorney Work Product -12- EFTA00224647 week against Jeff

A00224642 Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG who advised him to make the following proposal: "[w]e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding whethe

ions and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next week against Jeffrey Epstein. He said that his clients were frustrated with the lack of p

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(Me will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardin

ence. This reinforces the fact that no telephonic or Internet persuasion, inducement, enticement or coercion of any kind occurred. Furthermore, Mr. Herman, the attorney for most of the civil complainants, was quoted in the Palm Beach Post as saying that "it doesn't matter" that his clients lied about t

the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the federal resolution as required by law; however, "[wje will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding w

rd H. Willits), #4, #13, #8 (via Jeffrey Herman), #9, #10, #11, #14, #16, #17 (via Theodore Leopold), #20, #21, #23, #24, #25 (via Jeffrey B \ , ' Herman), #26 (via Jeffrey Herman), #30, #31, #32, #33, #37 (via Michael E. Dutko), #38, #44 (via Jeffrey Herman) 9/3/2008 Victim notification letters to

Andrew Lourie Marie Villafana Email regarding proposed changes to indictment 36/64 / /6 /007 Meeting where Criminal Chief Menchel announces that USA Acosta will offer a two-year state plea. Present: Matt Menchel, Marie Villafana, Andy Lourie (phone), Valerie Parlave, Junior Ortiz, Nesbitt Kuyrkendall,

ions and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next week against Jeffrey Epstein. He said that his clients were frustrated with the lack of p

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(Me will defer to the discretion of the State Anorney regarding

ons and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next week against Jeffrey Epstein. He said that his clients were frustrated with the lack of p

no less." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "bode will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardi

ions and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next Confidential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product -12- EFTA00225189 r • week agains

A00225184 Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "[wie will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regard

instein never spoke about any specific case. Since the January 7,2008 conversation, Weinstein has not had any further contact with Mr. Thomas. 2. Herman 5/omen & Merme/stein. Seven years ago, I resigned from the SDFL for private practice. Less than five months later, I resigned from the law firm and

ss." Mr. Starr also objected to the SOFLis intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: Il(w)e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regard

ons and/or the Florida Bar. On Friday, January 18, 2008, at approximately 1:15 pm, I received a call from Jeffrey Herman of Herman & Mermelstein. Herman said that he was planning to file a civil lawsuit the next week against Jeffrey Epstein. He said that his clients were frustrated with the lack of p

no less." Mr. Starr also objected to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DRAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "(w)e will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regardi

rmer law partner, has tiled several civil lawsuits against Mr. Epstein on behalf of the alleged "victims." ft is our understanding that each of Mr. Herman's clients arc on the EFTA00225684 UO/V4IV9 sun CAA OVO 00V O1%V 05/28/2008 00:09 FAX 2026161230 DA VON 13:24 KAX 1 :13 660 6500 LSGVUAAVD Ur

the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." Regarding the issue of notice to the victims, USA Acosta proposed to notify them of the federal resolution as required by law; however, "rwle will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding w