Epstein Secrets

t the same time (and until as recently as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar website continued to identify Mr. Sloman as a named partner in Mr. Herman’s firm. See Tab 31, Florida Bar Website page. Mr. Herman, who is the named pariner in the former firm of Herman, Sloman, & Mermelstein, filed five l

o believe that, around this same time, Mr. Sloman’s former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.> At the same time (and until as recently as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar website continued to identify Mr. Sloman as a named pa

t no telephonic or Internet persuasion, inducement, enticement or coercion of a minor, or of any other individual, occurred. In addition, Mr. Jeffrey Herman, the former law partner of one of the federal prosecutors involved in this matter and the attorney for most of the civil complainants (as described i

e negotiations of a deferred prosecution agreement. The consistent representations of key Government witnesses (such as Tatum Miller, Brittany Beale, Saige Gonzalez, and Jennifer Laduke) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, telephonic or otherwise, that meets the requi

z.5 At the same time (and until as recent] as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar websitc continued to identify Mr. as a named partner in Mr. Herman's firm. See Tab 31, Florida Bar Website page. 39. Mr. Herman, who is the named partner in the former firm of Herman, , & Mermelstein, filed five

eason to believe that, around this same time, Mr. former law partner, Jeffrey Herman, had met with the father of one of the prospective plaintiffs, Saige Gonzalez.5 At the same time (and until as recent] as March of 2008), the Official Florida Bar websitc continued to identify Mr. as a named partner

rmer law partner, has filed several civil lawsuits against Mr. Epstein on behalf of the alleged "victims." It is our understanding that each of Mr. Herman's clients are on the EFTA00192764 &bell 08/02/08 05. 10.11$ MON 15: 02 MON 13:25 FAX FAX 305 I 530 213 6440 080 8500 EXECUTIVE OFFICE Al RK

e negotiations of a deterred prosecution a reement. The consistent a re . resentations of ke Government witnesses (such as Tatum. Brittany Beak, Saige . and in) confirm the following critical points: First, there was no communication, totelephonic or otherwise, that meets the requirements of § 24

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Sent: W n r h 2008 10:35 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: : pstein Marie, Still no word from Mr. Herman. Just to clarify about the memory cards - Joe and Ja0in have both reviewed the evidence some time ago. There is no significant photographs on the ca

time, it just matters to adding new charges. Can you call Mr. Herman and see if he will give us the following items without a subpoena? I. Copy of Saige's deposition transcript 2. Copy of any video and/or audiorecording of that deposition 3. Transcript(s) of any other depositions taken in that suit

e 18 appropriate for this deposition. 19 BY MR. TEIN: 20 Q. Go ahead. Please answer yes or no. 21 22 Q. Thank you. 23 in fact, you know that Mr. Herman held a 24 press conference after he filed the fFifty-million-do} lar 25 lawsuit on your behalf, don't you? Page 11 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012406 —_ oO o

TXT answer the question, because any of those conversations involve her counsel. MR. TEIN: Certify that. MR. LEOPOLD: Please. BY MR. TEIN: Q. Now, Saige, you lied to get out of this deposition, didn't you? 54 A. No, sir. Q. You didn't want to come to court today and tell the story that you had tol