Epstein Secrets

n at least as early as 2001, so all of the victims were minors at the time of the offense." (DE 407 at ¶ 83.) On December 7, 2007, defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez sent a letter to AUSA requesting "that the Office hold off on sending any victim notification letters." No letters were sent in December of 2007. (

obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00040769 Cas

n at least as early as 2001, so all of the victims were minors at the time of the offense." (DE 407 at ¶ 83.) On December 7, 2007, defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez sent a letter to AUSA Sloman, requesting "that the Office hold off on sending any victim notification letters." No letters were sent in December of

obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00794152 Cas

n at least as early as 2001, so all of the victims were minors at the time of the offense." (DE 407 at ¶ 83.) On December 7, 2007, defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez sent a letter to AUSA I I, requesting "that the Office hold off on sending any victim notification letters." No letters were sent in December of 20

obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00081363 Cas

n at least as early as 2001, so all of the victims were minors at the time of the offense." (DE 407 at ¶ 83.) On December 7, 2007, defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez sent a letter to AUSA Sloman, requesting "that the Office hold off on sending any victim notification letters." No letters were sent in December of

obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00083596 Cas

n at least as early as 2001, so all of the victims were minors at the time of the offense." (DE 407 at ¶ 83.) On December 7, 2007, defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez sent a letter to AUSA Sloman, requesting "that the Office hold off on sending any victim notification letters." No letters were sent in December of

obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00098444 Cas

n at least as early as 2001, so all of the victims were minors at the time of the offense." (DE 407 at ¶ 83.) On December 7, 2007, defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez sent a letter to AUSA requesting "that the Office hold off on sending any victim notification letters." No letters were sent in December of 2007. (

obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00010537 ---

n at least as early as 2001, so all of the victims were minors at the time of the offense." (DE 407 at ¶ 83.) On December 7, 2007, defense attorney Lilly Ann Sanchez sent a letter to AUSA requesting "that the Office hold off on sending any victim notification letters." No letters were sent in December of 2007. (

obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00027696 ---