Back to People & Entities
Mohasco Corp.
Organization
4
Total Mentions
4
Documents
129
Connected Entities
Mohasco Corp., a former carpet and furniture manufacturer, appears in the Epstein documents in relation to a legal citation.
Mohasco Corp. is mentioned in four documents, all referencing the same legal case, *Mohasco Corp. v. Silver*, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). The citation is used to support the argument that an agency's interpretation of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress. The documents appear to be legal filings related to victims' rights.
Key Highlights
- •Mohasco Corp. is cited in legal documents concerning victims' rights.
- •The citation relates to a Supreme Court case about statutory interpretation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Links
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (4)
1 mention
obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00010537 ---
Page: EFTA00010538 →1 mention
obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Given that the USAO-SDFL had told the victims that the CVRA applied, it was obligated to confer with them and
Page: EFTA00021459 →1 mention
obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Given that the USAO-SDFL had told the victims that the CVRA applied, it was obligated to confer with them and
Page: EFTA00022563 →Sponsored
1 mention
obligations to notify the victims. In any event, an agency's own "'interpretation' of a statute cannot supersede the language chosen by Congress." Mohasco Corp. v. Silver, 447 U.S. 807, 825 (1980). Next, the Court rejects the Government's contention that Jane Doe 2 is not protected by 31 EFTA00027696 ---
Page: EFTA00027697 →Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 129)
Department of Justice
Organization4 docs4 co-mentions
Kenna
PersonAmerican singer
4 docs4 co-mentions
Silver
Organization4 docs4 co-mentions
Alexander Acosta
PersonAmerican attorney and politician
4 docs4 co-mentions
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
4 docs4 co-mentions
Kenneth Marra
PersonAmerican judge
4 docs4 co-mentions
WA
Walker
Person4 docs4 co-mentions
Southern District of Florida
Location4 docs4 co-mentions
U.S. Attorney's Office
Organization4 docs4 co-mentions
JD
Jane Doe
Person2001 album by Converge
4 docs4 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
4 docs4 co-mentions
BE
Bradley Edwards
PersonWikimedia disambiguation page
3 docs3 co-mentions
FBI
Organization2 docs2 co-mentions
Michael Cohen
PersonAmerican former attorney and former Republican official
2 docs2 co-mentions
JH
Jeffrey Herman
PersonMale given name
2 docs2 co-mentions
Jay Lefkowitz
PersonAmerican lawyer
2 docs2 co-mentions
Barry Krischer
Person2 docs2 co-mentions
HE
Herman
PersonMale given name
2 docs2 co-mentions
the University of Utah
Organization2 docs2 co-mentions
Lilly Ann Sanchez
Person2 docs2 co-mentions