Epstein Secrets

HT_013323 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

HT_013323 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

ay have civil damages claims against Mr. Epstein. The U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (jointly

’s witness tampering as follows: "UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER” On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards traveled to the home of Leslie Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena with an investigation pending in the Southern District

HT_010570 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

HT_010570 --- PAGE BREAK --- minor females that the United States Attorney's Office recognized as a victim. L.M.’s swom deposition te

’s witness tampering as follows: "UNITED STATES vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN PLEA PROFFER” On August 21, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards traveled to the home of Leslie Groff to serve her with a federal grand jury subpoena with an investigation pending in the Southern District

e Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. This made Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 "victims" protected by the Crime Victim's Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. Accordingly, the U.S. Attorney's Office arranged to have victim notification letters sent to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. For example, on about June 7, 2007, Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Mar

he Government from conferring with the victims about the plea arrangement. On about October 26, 2007, FBI Special Agents E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall and Jason Richards met in person with Jane Doe #1 at a restaurant. The Special Agents explained that there had been discussions with Epstein about a possible

ent, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. However, after a thorough investigation, and based on the facts of this case and your personal circumstances, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York ("USAO-SDNY") has determined that the interests of justice will best be served by deferring prosecution in thi

dges that she understands and voluntarily accepts each and every term and condition of this Agreement. Dated: New York, New York May/ter° , 2021 Jason y, Esq. Atto ey for Defend - 4 - Tova Noel Defendant EFTA00023090 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 59 Filed 05/25/21 Page 5