Epstein Secrets

District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney 7 EFTA00235145 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 8 of 8 Ann Marie C. Villafana, AUSA s/ Brad Edwards Brad Edwards, Esquire Attorney for Petitioner I HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY that on September 25, 2008, a true and correct copy

FLSD Docket 09/25/2008 Page 8 of 8 Ann Marie C. Villafana, AUSA s/ Brad Edwards Brad Edwards, Esquire At

ictims' counsel would also like to discuss possible legal responses to the Government with other victims' rights attorneys, including in particular the National Alliance of Victims' Rights Attorneys for possible legal approaches. See http://www.ncvli.org/navra.html. The sealing order would apparently block these forms of consultation, or perhap

plain. Thus, petitioners' repeated 4 EFTA00204644 to the Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Victims Rights Act, as well as the Declaration of A. Marie Villafaila, Assistant U.S. Attorney, which accompanied the Government's response. This belief continued until August 2008, when the Government advised Epstein'

reement to the United States. Petitioners' claim that they wish to discuss with others the "possible legal responses" to the Government, including the National Alliance of Victims' Rights Attorneys, also provides no basis for vacatur of the Protective Order. Petitioners contend that the "sealing order would apparently block these forms of cons

plain. Thus, petitioners' repeated 4 EFTA00215928 to the Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Victims Rights Act, as well as the Declaration of A. Marie Villafaila, Assistant U.S. Attorney, which accompanied the Government's response. This belief continued until August 2008, when the Government advised Epstein'

reement to the United States. Petitioners' claim that they wish to discuss with others the "possible legal responses" to the Government, including the National Alliance of Victims' Rights Attorneys, also provides no basis for vacatur of the Protective Order. Petitioners contend that the "sealing order would apparently block these forms of cons